Covid

MASKING SAVES LIVES

Wednesday, May 19, 2021

The War Crimes in Gaza and Israel’s Crisis--Statement of the World Socialist Web Site

 

Original at:  https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2021/05/19/pers-m19-1.html?pk_campaign=newsletter&pk_kwd=wsws

The World Socialist Web Site unequivocally condemns the one-sided slaughter being carried out by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) against Gaza. For 10 days, Israeli planes and artillery have rained missiles, bombs and shells on a population of two million Palestinians trapped by a merciless and unrelenting Israeli occupation and blockade in the narrow and impoverished coastal enclave.

At least 219 Palestinians have been killed, nearly half of them women and children, while thousands more have been wounded. Some 41,000 Gazans have been forced to flee their homes to makeshift shelters in UN-run schools, while Israel’s tactics, including the toppling of entire high-rise buildings with “smart bombs”, has terrorized the entire population.

An Israeli artillery unit fires toward targets in Gaza Strip, at the Israeli Gaza border, Tuesday, May 18, 2021. (AP Photo/Tsafrir Abayov)

Gaza’s healthcare system is in a state of collapse, bed space and medical supplies running out. Hospitals that were already overcrowded due to the COVID-19 pandemic now overflow with wounded, many of them suffering grievous injuries. A nurse told Al Jazeera that severed arms and legs were being piled up on a hospital bed.

Damage to infrastructure and the cutoff of fuel to the territory is expected to plunge all of Gaza into a blackout, cutting off power to homes as well as hospitals and clinics, its sewer system and desalinization plant. Those killed by Israeli bombs and shells will only be part of the death toll, as the destruction and disabling of healthcare facilities and basic infrastructure will raise the mortality rate for a long time to come.

It is not only Israel that is guilty of war crimes, but also its chief enabler, US imperialism. In the midst of the bombardment, it was reported the Democratic administration of President Joe Biden formally notified the US Congress on May 5 of a $735 million arms package for Israel that includes Joint Direct Attack Munitions (JDAMs), the very weapons used to turn Gaza’s tallest buildings into rubble. The approval of this installment of the nearly $4 billion in aid that Washington provides Israel annually makes clear the direct complicity of the entire Democratic Party leadership in the crimes in Gaza.

Meanwhile, Washington has exercised its veto power three times in the course of a week to prevent the UN Security Council from issuing any statement criticizing Israel’s actions.

The response of the Biden White House to the unfolding massacre in Gaza provides incontrovertible proof of its continuity with the Trump administration, but also with its predecessors under Barack Obama and George W. Bush, which similarly aided and abetted the Israel’s wars waged in 2008-2009 and 2014, which together killed at least 3,500 Gazans, the overwhelming majority of them civilians.

Millions of working people and youth all over the world are justifiably outraged not only at Israel’s war crimes, but also at their hypocritical justification by the likes of Biden and US Secretary of State Antony Blinken, who incessantly mouth the phrase “Israel has the right to defend itself.” In practice, this means that an occupying power with one of the most advanced war machines in the world has the “right” to inflict unrestricted death and violence upon the occupied, a virtually defenseless population of refugees trapped in a huge ghetto of Israel’s own making. On Monday, Biden joined this refrain with a meaningless expression, announced by a spokesperson, of his platonic support for a ceasefire with no date certain.

Overwhelming popular anger over the war crimes in Gaza has found expression in hundreds of protests that have taken place on every continent, save Antarctica. The support for Israeli aggression by the United States and the other imperialist powers notwithstanding, in the eyes of millions around the world, Israel is viewed as pariah, a state that has lost all moral and political legitimacy.

The attempts to brand these protests as anti-Semitic is being seen for what it is, a hamfisted attempt by Israel and its imperialist backers to quash any opposition to their crimes and a libel against millions of Jews all over the world who are shocked and revolted by the actions of the Zionist state.

Anger and protests, however, are not enough. What is required is a political perspective on what has produced these crimes and how they can be stopped.

The eruption of violence against Gaza is driven by the immense crisis and contradictions within Israeli society itself. Tel Aviv’s decision to go to war was in the first instance an attempt to contain a spiraling political crisis, with the failure to form a viable government after four elections in two years and a prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, who must remain in power to avoid being jailed on corruption charges.

Underlying this political crisis are intractable social contradictions. Israel remains, together with the US, among the most unequal of the OECD countries. According to the annual poverty report by the Israeli aid agency Latet, Israel’s poverty rate jumped from 20.1 percent to 29.3 percent in 2020, while, with the greatest concentration of billionaires in the world, its richest 20 individuals have amassed a combined wealth of over $61 billion.

The unsustainability of such a social divide has been laid bare by the revolt of Palestinian citizens of Israel, triggered initially by the violent police storming of the al-Aqsa Mosque and increasingly aggressive acts of “ethnic cleansing” in East Jerusalem. Israeli Palestinians, who make up 20 percent of the country’s population, joined Tuesday in general strike with Palestinians in the occupied territories to protest the assault on Gaza and against Israel’s apartheid-style “race laws” that condemn them to less than second-class citizenship. Workers shut down shops, schools and construction sites and stayed away from their jobs across the country.

While Israel’s ruling camarilla, representing the interests of its billionaire ruling class, seeks a base of support through the promotion of militarism and anti-Arab hatred, unleashing fascist-Zionist gangs on the streets, there is broad hostility to the government and its crimes within the working class and sympathy for the Palestinians. This found expression Sunday in a demonstration by Jewish and Israeli Palestinian healthcare workers outside Haifa’s Rambam hospital calling for unity, which in embryonic form expresses the drive by the working class to come together in a struggle against their joint oppressor.

Seventy-three years after the founding of the state of Israel and 55 years after the expansionist Six-Day War, the Israeli ruling class and its vast military apparatus have been unable to crush Palestinian resistance, which is inextricably tied to the immense internal contradictions of Israeli society as a whole. In response, the government behaves as if it has lost its head, lashing out with violence that can only deepen its crisis.

Israel finds itself at the end of is road. The entire Zionist project—a reactionary perspective of carving out a sectarian Jewish capitalist state in the Middle East through the dispossession of the Palestinian people—has manifestly failed. While Zionist ideology justified this state as a safe haven for Jews in the wake of the Holocaust, the Israeli government institutes race laws and carries out violent crimes that more and more resemble those of the Nazis.

The emergence of mass opposition among Israeli Arabs and Jewish working class to the crimes of the Israeli state further underscores the utter unviability of the Zionist project. As the efforts over decades to drive a wedge between Palestinian and Jews workers breaks down, raising the prospect of a working-class revolt, Israel is incapable of surviving except through the resort to totalitarian dictatorship.

Israel’s crisis is bound up with the breakdown of the entire nation-state system of the Middle East created through the formation of nominally independent states based on the borders drawn by the former colonial powers. The venal Arab bourgeoisie has dropped its charade of supporting the Palestinians and its promotion of the chimera of a “two-state solution” as it seeks to defend its own rule against rising social opposition by drawing closer to Israel and imperialism. A decade after the bloody suppression of the Egyptian Revolution all of the states bordering Israel—Lebanon, Jordan, Syria and Egypt itself—are wracked by internal conflict, while the broader Middle East has been devastated by US wars.

Hamas, the dominant political force in Gaza, is likewise incapable of offering any progressive alternative. Like the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO), it is wedded to the so-called two-state solution, that would maintain Gaza and the West Bank as Palestinian ghettos under the thumb of Zionist state. Under conditions where a rebellion is developing inside Israel itself, Hamas is incapable of making any appeal to the Israeli Arab population, let alone the Jewish working class.

General Mark Milley, chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, warned Monday that there could be “broader destabilization” and “a whole series of negative consequences if the fighting continues” in Gaza. The fear, clearly, is that the events in Israel and the occupied territories can trigger revolutionary upheavals throughout the region, while also posing the threat of a far wider war, in the first instance against Iran.

These alternatives, war and revolution, are posed not only in the Middle East, but on a world scale. In the face of a global pandemic that has claimed three and a half million lives, the imperialist powers are conducting a massive military buildup in preparation for global war.

The same pandemic has provoked social opposition in the working class and a worldwide escalation of the class struggle that is paving the way to social revolution.

Therein lies the road forward for the working masses of the entire Middle East. The central question is that of overcoming the crisis of perspective and leadership.

The dead end of bourgeois nationalism, from Nasserism to the PLO, has thoroughly vindicated Leon Trotsky’s theory of Permanent Revolution. It established that in the imperialist epoch, the realization of the basic tasks of liberation from imperialist oppression in the oppressed countries cannot be resolved under the leadership of the national bourgeoisie, which is thoroughly tied to and dependent upon imperialism. They can be achieved only through the independent political intervention of the working class on the basis of a socialist and internationalist program.

The military assault on Gaza and the growing revolt within Israel itself pose with utmost urgency the struggle to unite the working class, Arab, Jewish and Iranian, across all national and sectarian divides, in a common struggle for a Socialist Federation of the Middle East as part of the fight to put an end to capitalism all over the world.

The vital task of mobilizing the working class on the basis of this program depends upon the building of a new revolutionary leadership, organized as sections of the International Committee of the Fourth International in every country.  [Emphasis added.]

 

Tuesday, May 18, 2021

The Mask of 'Liberal Democracy' in Europe Falls with a Bang -- Pepe Escobar

 

Original at:  https://www.presstv.com/Detail/2021/05/18/656935/The-Mask-Of-Liberal-Democracy-Falls-With-Bang


US Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) (L) talks with Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) during a rally with fellow Democrats before voting on H.R. 1, or the People Act, on the East Steps of the US Capitol on March 08, 2019 in Washington, DC. (AFP photo)
The mask of “liberal democracy” has kept falling while imperial Big Tech is dutifully canceling the voices of Palestinians and defenders of Palestine en masse.

By Pepe Escobar

 

Future historians will mark the day when Western “liberal democracy” issued a graphic proclamation: We bomb media offices and destroy “freedom of the press” in an open air concentration camp while we forbid peaceful demonstrations under a state of siege in the heart of Europe; and if you revolt, we cancel you.

Gaza meets Paris.

The bombing of the al-Jalaa tower – an eminently residential building which also housed the bureaus of al-Jazeera and AP, among others – by “the only democracy in the Middle East” is directly connected to the verboten order carried out by Macron’s Ministry of Interior.

For all practical purposes Paris endorsed the occupying power’s provocations in East Jerusalem; the invasion of al-Aqsa mosque – complete with tear gas and stun grenades; racist Zionist gangs harassing and crying “death to Arabs”; armed settlers aggressing Palestinian families threatened with expulsion from their homes in Sheikh Jarrah and Silwan; a campaign of carpet bombing whose lethal victims – on average – are 30% children.

Paris crowds were not intimidated. From Barbes to Republique, they marched in the streets – their rallying cry being Israel assassin, Macron complice. They instinctively understodood that Le Petit Roi – a puny Rothschild employee – had just firebombed the historical legacy of the nation that coined the Déclaration Universelle des Droits de L’Homme.

The mask of “liberal democracy” kept falling again and again in a loop – with imperial Big Tech dutifully canceling the voices of Palestinians and defenders of Palestine en masse, in tandem with a diplomatic kabuki that could fool only the already brain-dead.

On May 16, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi chaired a United States Security Council (UNSC) debate via video link that had been stalled by Washington, non-stop, throughout the week. China presides the UNSC throughout May.

The UNSC could not even agree on a mere joint statement. Once again because the UNSC was blocked by the – cowardly – Empire of Chaos.

It was up to Hua Liming, former Chinese ambassador to Iran, to break it all down in a single sentence:

“The US doesn’t want to give the credit of mediating the Palestine-Israel conflict to China, especially when China is the president of the UNSC.”

The usual imperial procedure is to “talk”, “offer you can’t refuse” Mafia-style, to both sides under the table – as the combo behind Crash Test Dummy, an avowed Zionist, had already admitted on an appalling White House tweet “reaffirming” its “strong support for Israel’s right to defend itself”.

Liming emphasized, correctly, “this is the key reason why any solution or ceasefire between Israel and Gaza or other forces in the region would be temporary.”

The whole Global South is incessantly bombarded by the imperial “human rights” rhetoric – from convicted crook Navalny to fake reports on Xinjiang. Yet when there is a real human rights catastrophe unleashed by the settler colonialist ally’s carpet bombing, Liming pointed out how “the hypocrisy and double standards of the US have been exposed again”.

One phone call can stop it

Amos Yadlin is the former IDF Military Intelligence Directorate chief, and also former Israeli military attaché to the US.

In a meeting with South African Zionists, he admitted the obvious: the Zionist carnage against Gaza can be stopped by Crash Test Dummy – who happens to be, what else, a Zionist puppet.

Yadlin claimed that the Crash Test Dummy administration, rather the combo behind it, was getting “impatient” and he would be “not surprised if this will all stop in 48 hours.” And once again he had to reinforce the obvious: “When the Egyptians ask Israel to stop, Israel doesn’t want to stop. But if the Americans will ask Israel to stop, Israel will have to listen.”

The Empire practices trademark doublespeak when referring to the “international community” – which in theory gathers at the UN. The concomitant 24/7 propaganda barrage applies only to the motley crew of partners in crime, minions, lackeys, poodles and vassals, imperially ignoring and/or pissing on the heads of over 80% of the planet. Confronted with the reality of Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Ukraine and others, “rules-based international order” does not even qualify as a joke for retards.

So next time you see some sub-zoology specimen deploying the “Israel has the right to defend itself” Maximum Stupidity argument, the only possible response is to unleash facts as missiles.

Every sentient being with a conscience knows Palestine faces a racist settler colonialism project boasting an armed-to-the-hilt-military and several nuclear bombs, specialized in practicing state terrorism.

Gaza though is a particularly horrifying case. Population: nearly 2 million people. One of the top densely populated areas on the planet. A de facto open air concentration camp where no less than 50% are children, one in ten stunted to a great extent because of food shortages provoked by the Israeli blockade. The official Israeli military plan is to allow just enough food in so the whole population barely survives. 50% of the population depends on food aid.

No less than 70% of families are refugees, who were ethnically cleansed from what is now southern Israel: there are roughly 1.46 million refugees out of a population of 1.9 million.

Gaza has 8 refugee camps – some being bombed as we speak. Never forget that Israel ruled Gaza directly from 1967 to 2005 and did less than zero to better their appalling conditions.

There are only 22 health centers, 16 social services offices and 11 food distribution centers, serving roughly 1 million people. No airport or port: both destroyed by Israel. The unemployment rate is 50% – the highest on the whole planet. Clean water is available to only 5% of the population.

But then there’s the Resistance. Elijah Magnier has shown how they have already pierced Israel’s pre-fabricated aura of invulnerability and “prestige” – and there’s only one way to go, as the speed, accuracy, range and potency of rockets and missiles can only improve.

In parallel, in a wise strategic move, Hamas and Islamic Jihad have made it very clear they prefer that Hezbollah does not get itself directly involved – for now, thus allowing the whole Global South to be focused on the carnage perpetrated against Gaza.

“A landscape of iron and desolation”

Sociologie de Jerusalem, by Sylvaine Bulle, is a short but quite illuminating book showing how the battle for East Jerusalem is as imperative for the future of Palestine as the tragedy in Gaza.

Bulle focuses on the “internal racism” in Israel directly linked to the hegemony of extreme-right Zionist “elites”. A key consequence has been the “peripherization” and marginalization of East Jerusalem, thrown into a situation of “forced dependence” of Westernized West Jerusalem.

Bulle shows how East Jerusalem only exists as “a landscape of iron and desolation”, through a juxtaposition of ultra-dense and totally abandoned zones. Palestinians who live in these areas are not regarded or respected as citizens.

It got much worse after 2004 and the construction of The Wall – which prevented the daily mobility of Palestinians living in the occupied territories and the Palestinians in Jerusalem. That was an extra fracture, with parts of East Jerusalem isolated on the other side of the wall and a lot of people now living in a real no man’s land. Very few across the “liberal democratic” West have any idea how does that feel in practice.

Palestinians in East Jerusalem don’t have Israeli nationality. Most have Jordanian passports. Yet now even Palestinians with Israeli nationality are rebelling – in most cases in very poor towns in the center of the country. Young generations simply have no reason to believe they belong in Israel.

As for Israeli secular leftists, they have been “neutralized” and carry no political power, as they were incapable of integrating the working masses, which in turn were completely captured by hardcore religious extremists.

Bulle’s conclusion, expressed with way too much diplomacy (this is France, after all), is inevitable: the state of Israel is more and more Jewish and less and less democratic, a de facto Zionist regime. She believes it might be possible to rebuild the link between Jewish national identity and democracy, including the rights of Palestinian minorities.

Sorry, but that’s not gonna happen, as the current tragedy, which started in East Jerusalem, graphically shows.

The Via Dolorosa continues – as we all watch in horror. Just imagine the inter-galactic Western levels of hysteria if Russia or China were bombing, firing shells and missiles and killing children in residential areas. No wonder the Empire of Chaos – and Lies, posing as a “liberal democracy” while enabling the murderous Zionist project, is firmly flirting with the dustbin of History.


 

Friday, May 14, 2021

Israel’s war crimes and the hypocrisy of “human rights” imperialism - World Socialist Web Site

Israel’s war crimes and the hypocrisy of “human rights” imperialism - World Socialist Web Site: 

Excerpt:

Meanwhile, those who expose the crimes of Israel are branded as “anti-Semites” in an exercise that twists that term beyond recognition into a calumny against anyone who expresses the disgust and anger felt by people all over the world, including millions of Jews, over the ongoing war crimes in Gaza. Indeed, this definition is itself anti-Semitic, identifying Jews everywhere with the criminal policies of a state that rules in the interest of a narrow Israeli financial and corporate oligarchy. 

The vast gulf separating the indifference of US imperialism toward these crimes and its “horror” and invocation of “human rights” in relation to Xinjiang proves once again that all morality is class morality. The moral indignation of imperialist operatives like Blinken is activated only when it is needed to justify wars of aggression and plunder and advance the interests of the US financial oligarchy. 

That the filthy banner of “human rights” previously raised to justify wars in the Balkans, the Middle East and North Africa is now being unfurled as part of the preparations for “great power” conflict with China and Russia is a measure of the extreme tensions and dangers in the global situation.

Wednesday, May 12, 2021

Global Solidarity with Palestine

 

Tuesday, May 11, 2021

No, Uncle Sam. Palestine Has the Right to Self-Defense (Always)

 


Israel Kills 24 in Gaza as Netanyahu Steps up Provocations on Jerusalem Day

 

 Original at:  https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2021/05/11/isra-m11.html

Israel launched air strikes against Gaza, the besieged Palestinian enclave, killing 24 people including children.

Militants had earlier fired a few rockets at southern Israel and the Jerusalem area, in a day characterized by massive violence against the Palestinians in occupied East Jerusalem.

Israel’s military announced it had beefed up its forces on its border with Gaza and was suspending a major drill to prepare for a possible escalation.

Palestinians evacuate a wounded man during clashes with Israeli security forces at the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound in Jerusalem's Old City Monday, May 10, 2021. (AP Photo/Mahmoud Illean)

Earlier in the morning, 1,000 security forces stormed the al-Aqsa Mosque compound in East Jerusalem as worshippers were praying, firing stun grenades, tear gas and rubber bullets, while snipers took up positions on rooftops, injuring more than 330 Palestinians. More than 700 Palestinians have been injured in just a few days by Israeli security forces in Jerusalem and across the West Bank.

Police locked hundreds of worshippers inside the mosque, prevented doctors and medical teams from entering the compound and attacked and beat up those who sought to help the injured. They forced their way into the compound’s health clinic, where they sprayed pepper gas and lobbed stun grenades at those receiving treatment there.

The storming of the mosque, the third holiest site in Islam, provoked angry demonstrations around the country, including in the northern Arab city of Umm al-Fahm and the nearby Wadi Ara, as well as in Jaffa which has witnessed protests over the past week against plans to take over Palestinian-owned houses for a Jewish yeshiva.

The crackdown on Jerusalem Day—the anniversary of Israel’s illegal annexation of East Jerusalem, captured from Jordan in the 1967 War—ahead of the planned Flags March by Israel’s settler groups and far right forces through Arab neighbourhoods, was another provocation designed to precipitate a war with the Palestinians.

It was by far the most violent crackdown in the weeks of mounting tensions and bloody repression by Israel’s security forces since the start of Ramadan on April 12, amid protests against land grabs by Israeli settlers, settlement expansion, and the planned eviction of scores of Palestinians in Sheikh Jarrah, north of Jerusalem’s Old City. A factor in the explosive state of social relations has been the impact of the pandemic that has left thousands of young people without work.

The planned eviction is part of the government’s broader process of judaicising the city, making it impossible for the Palestinians to ever set up their own mini-state with some part of East Jerusalem as its capital. Far right legislators, including Religious Zionism chairman Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben-Gvir of Jewish Power have led their supporters through Sheikh Jarrah, taunting the Palestinians, chanting “death to Arabs”. Smotrich called on the right-wing parties in talks with opposition leader Yair Lapid, who heads Yesh Atid and is trying to cobble together a coalition to replace Netanyahu, to halt all talks with Mansour Abbas and his United Arab List, denouncing him as a “terror” supporter.

On Thursday night, more than 100 Palestinians were wounded, with 21 needing hospitalization, after hundreds of far right Jewish Israelis marched through Jerusalem’s streets and confronted Palestinians. On Friday night, more than 200 Palestinians were injured, of whom 88 had to be taken to hospital, after several hundred riot police stormed the al-Aqsa mosque compound, provoking bloody confrontations with worshippers. There were violent clashes at Sheikh Jarrah as several hundred worshippers went to show their solidarity with residents.

On Saturday night, 80 people were injured, including a one-year-old, when clashes erupted outside the Old City, while on Sunday, 14 people had to be treated for injuries after riot police attacked Palestinians protesting the Sheikh Jarrah evictions.

There have also been demonstrations against Israel’s brutal crackdown in East Jerusalem and in support of the Sheikh Jarrah families in a number of Arab towns and villages in Israel, as well as in the port city of Haifa and the northern city of Nazareth, and in Ramallah in the occupied West Bank that were met with heavy handed repression.

These demonstrations in the last few days of mainly young Palestinians mark an unprecedented involvement of Israel’s Palestinian citizens in anti-government protests. It is a spontaneous movement, increasingly alienated from its traditional leaders—the Fatah-dominated Palestinian Authority, Hamas in Gaza and the Arab leaders in Israel.

On Sunday, flatly rejecting international condemnation of the planned evictions of Palestinians from their homes in Sheikh Jarrah, Netanyahu declared Israel “firmly rejects” pressure not to build in Jerusalem. Turning truth on its head, he proclaimed that Israel would not allow any extremist element—meaning the Palestinians—to undermine peace in Jerusalem, “We will impose law and order aggressively and responsibly. We will continue to safeguard freedom of worship for all religions but will not allow violent riots.” “I say to the terror groups: Israel will respond with force to any act of aggression from the Gaza Strip,” he added.

He refused multiple entreaties from international figures as well as his own security officials to postpone the Jerusalem Day Flags March, limit the number of participants and change the route, so as not to enter the al-Aqsa compound. He and Public Security Minister Amir Ohana insisted on letting the march go ahead without any changes to the route, with the police offering thousands of officers to escort the march. Netanyahu defended the security forces, praising their “just struggle” and commending the “steadfastness that the Israeli police and our security forces are currently displaying.”

On Monday afternoon, barely an hour before the march was due to start, the organisers announced they were calling it off telling the police they were ceding responsibility to them even as thousands of religious and ultra-nationalist youth were assembling. This came shortly after the authorities, reportedly in response to an order from Netanyahu, decided to reroute the march away from the Old City, including Damascus Gate and the Muslim Quarter, in Palestinian East Jerusalem.

It was at this time that Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated group that controls Gaza, which has been subject since 2007 to an illegal blockade by Israel and latterly by Egypt, issued “an ultimatum until 6pm” to Israel to withdraw its security forces from the al-Aqsa mosque compound and Sheikh Jarrah. As the ultimatum expired, the Israeli military activated sirens, the Knesset was evacuated, and the Flags March dispersed after reports of rocket fire in the Jerusalem area.

Netanyahu called for a national security cabinet meeting in preparation for increasing turmoil ahead of Eid al-Fitr that marks the end of Ramadan on Wednesday evening, May 12.

 

Opinion | Sheikh Jarrah and the Violent Brazenness of Israel’s Colonialist Project - Noura Erakat & Mariam Barghout - Washington Posti

Opinion | Sheikh Jarrah and the violent brazenness of Israel’s colonialist project - The Washington Post: When will the world open its eyes to this injustice and respond appropriately?

Excerpt:

"Our freedom struggle is not for a state but for belonging to the land, to remain on it, to keep our homes, to resist erasure."

Monday, May 10, 2021

Amsterdam supports #SheikhJarrah and #FreePalestine


 

World Supports #SheikhJarrah and #Palestine

 

 


Football players of the Chilean Club Deportivo Palestino express their solidarity with the people of Jerusalem and all of Palestine by wearing the Palestinian keffiyeh.

Wednesday, April 28, 2021

Human Rights Watch: Israel Guilty of Apartheid – Consortiumnews [Way Past Time, But Welcome]

Human Rights Watch: Israel Guilty of Apartheid – Consortiumnews

 

EXCERPT:

Among the discriminatory actions detailed in the report is Israel’s allocation, or lack thereof, of water to Palestinians. From the report:

“Israel has used its control over parts of the Mountain Aquifer in the West Bank to serve its own citizens and settlers, in contravention of international humanitarian law which prohibits occupiers from exploiting natural resources for its own economic benefit. While 80% of the Mountain Aquifer’s water recharge area lies beneath the West Bank, Israel directly extracts about 90% of the water that is withdrawn from the aquifer annually, leaving Palestinians only the remaining 10% or so to exploit directly. In monopolizing this shared resource, Israeli authorities sharply restrict the ability of Palestinians to directly exploit their own natural resources and render them dependent on Israel for their water supply. For decades, authorities have denied Palestinians permits to drill new wells, in particular in the most productive Western Aquifer basins, or to rehabilitate existing ones. While the Oslo Accords of 1995 included provisions that promised to increase Palestinian access to water, Palestinian extraction levels have largely remained at pre-Oslo levels while the population has increased.

Despite the establishment of a ‘Joint Water Commission” (JWC) as part of the Oslo Accords, the World Bank in 2009 noted that Israel has retained “virtually all the power,” including veto power, over the West Bank’s water resources. While approving virtually all requests for Israeli-proposed projects to serve settlers, the JWC has rejected many Palestinian-initiated projects, including all requests to drill in the Western Aquifer Basin. Israelis are often permitted to drill deeper into the Aquifer, regularly develop internal settlement water networks without seeking JWC approval, and can extract water without limit when it flows downstream into Israel without need for JWC approval, while Palestinians face strict extraction quotas…

In addition, Israeli authorities have almost entirely deprived Palestinians access to water from the Jordan River, the only major surface water resource in the West Bank, by diverting its flow upstream of the West Bank.”

HRW says the findings should serve as a call to action to the international community.

Global powers like the U.S. and European Union’s approach to Israel thus far “overlooks the deeply entrenched nature of Israeli discrimination and repression of Palestinians there [and] minimizes serious human rights abuses by treating them as temporary symptoms of the occupation that the ‘peace process’ will soon cure.” This failure to hold Israel to account for its abuses, the report continues, has allowed the apartheid regime to “metastasize and consolidate.”

Among the recommendations the report lays out are for the International Criminal Court to investigate alleged crimes against humanity. The United Nations must also take action by establishing an envoy position focused on ending persecution and apartheid worldwide, and businesses operating in the OPT must stop contributing to any actions that facilitate the deprivation of Palestinian rights such as the demolition of their homes.

 

 

 

Thursday, April 15, 2021

Biden's Claim To Be Ending America's Longest War Misleading - CovertAction Magazine

Biden's Claim To Be Ending America's Longest War Misleading - CovertAction Magazine

MUST READ: 

 

"(Afghan) military is funded by the United States at a cost of around $4 billion per year. This support is going to continue..." PLUS U.S. special forces and bases.

 

***

"Uncle Sam also covets Afghans mineral wealth. A 2007 United States Geological Service survey discovered nearly $1 trillion in mineral deposits, including huge veins of iron, copper, cobalt, gold and critical industrial metals like lithium, which is used in the manufacture of batteries for laptops and blackberries. An 'nternal Pentagon memo stated that Afghanistan could become the “Saudi Arabia of lithium.'"

 

Tuesday, April 13, 2021

Poekhali! Gagarin's Speech Marking the 1st Anniversary of His Famous Flight [and Invoking Peace for the Planet]

Ramsey Clark, Former Attorney General of the United States and Principled Critic of the U.S. Warfare State, Dies at 93 - CovertAction Magazine

Ramsey Clark, Former Attorney General of the United States and Principled Critic of the U.S. Warfare State, Dies at 93 - CovertAction Magazine: 

Excerpts--recommend reading whole thing.  We're going to miss this guy.

"On April 9th, Ramsey Clark passed away at his home surrounded by his family. Clark was Attorney General of the United States from 1967-1969 under Lyndon Johnson, during which time he led the way on voting rights for African-Americans, and school desegregation and drafted the landmark Civil Rights Act of 1968, better known as the Fair Housing Act, which addressed housing discrimination."

***

"A man of strong ideals and few words, Clark would provide a simple response. “Democracy is not a spectator sport,” he was fond of saying. He believed that for a country to truly be democratic, the people must participate. They must hold their government accountable for its actions. And he spent his life trying to do that. 

 

 

Saturday, April 10, 2021

Ukraine redux, by Pepe Escobar - The Unz Review [NATO stupidly rattling sabers might back-fire]

Ukraine redux, by Pepe Escobar - The Unz Review: 

Excerpt:

“By the way,” Ischenko added, “the Americans do not give a damn whether Ukraine will hold out for any time or whether it will be blown to pieces in an instant. They believe they stand to gain from either outcome.”

Why Ukraine’s Borders Are Back at the Center of Geopolitics--Vijay Prashad

Why Ukraine’s Borders Are Back at the Center of Geopolitics: 

Excerpt:

NATO’s pressure against Russia exacerbated and joined with extreme Ukrainian nationalists—including fascists such as the Azov Battalion—to drive an anti-Russian cultural and political movement in the country. Former Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko, who benefited from Western backing, put forward a language law in 2017 that hampers the teaching of the minority languages in the country’s schools. The target for the law was to de-Russianize the population, but it had an impact on the country’s smaller minorities. For that reason, Bulgaria, Greece, Hungary and Romania filed complaints with the Council of Europe.

Hungary’s Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó said on Facebook in late 2020 that his government would “stand up for Transcarpathian Hungarians in every international forum.” Ukraine, he said, “not a member of NATO, has launched an attack against a minority group originating from a NATO member country.” The contradictions of Ukraine-NATO’s anti-Russian agenda run afoul of other NATO members for reasons that were not calibrated carefully.

Firing across the Ukraine-Russia border has stepped up, egged on by Biden’s full-throated support of Zelensky’s newly found anti-Russian ambitions. A senior United Nations official at the Department of Political and Peacekeeping Affairs tells me that they want military forces to withdraw from the border. All the main platforms for negotiation—the Normandy Format and the Arria Formula meetings at the UN—are in a stalemate. “We need cool heads to prevail,” said the UN official. “Anything other than that could lead to a catastrophic war.”

Sunday, March 28, 2021

Belarus' MFA Supports Aspirations of American People

Belarus' MFA supports aspirations of American people for better future, admires courage, determination of American heroes including Snowden, Australia's Assange

 *Emphasis mine.

MINSK, 26 March (BelTA) - The Belarusian Ministry of Foreign Ministry supports the aspirations of the American people for a better future, reads the commentary of the press service of the Belarusian Ministry of Foreign Affairs released in response to the U.S. Embassy's statement of 25 March 2020, BelTA has learned.

“In connection with the statement of the U.S. Embassy of 25 March 2021, we express our sincere appreciation to the United States for finally showing readiness to shift the bilateral rhetoric onto a constructive track and for congratulating our country on the significant date in our history. We would welcome the extension of this practice to public holidays,” the commentary reads. *“We acknowledge our mistake and take the opportunity to apologize for failing to congratulate the United States on the recent 160th anniversary of the adoption of the Constitution of the Confederate States of America, whose flag is still dear to many Americans. On the other hand, the BLM movement has tens of millions of activists across the country."

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs noted with regret that today the American society is deeply divided and quoted the current U.S. President Joseph Biden: “My whole soul is in bringing America together, uniting our people, and uniting our nation... I know the forces that divide us are deep and they are real… Let us start afresh. Let us listen to one another. Hear one another. See one another.”

“We support the aspirations of the American people for a better future – on this day and every day! Therefore, we believe that only a genuine inclusive dialogue will help the American nation to unite at this difficult moment in history. As a selfless gesture of goodwill, Belarus, having experience of hosting the negotiations of the TCG [Trilateral Contract Group for the peaceful settlement of the situation in eastern Ukraine] is ready to offer its services in organizing such a process,” the press service noted.

The ministry noted that although more than two centuries have passed since the United States declared its independence, the recent events in the country show that the struggle of the American people for freedom still continues. “Hundreds of thousands of Americans of all ages are publicly demanding the right to define their country's future. In attempting to have their voices heard many of them pay a heavy price as the regime resorted to lethal force and gunned down several people to maintain its grip on power and lock in results of the election,” the statement reads.

“We admire the courage and determination of American heroes, including Julian Assange, Edward Snowden, and Chelsea Manning, who sacrificed almost everything for the sake of true freedom and harmony in the American society. Belarus supports the American people and looks forward to the day when every common American will be able to walk by the Capitol freely,” the press service of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said.

The Belarusian Ministry of Foreign Affairs is also grateful to the new U.S. Ambassador to Belarus Julie Fischer for "an invaluable help in telling the entire Belarusian people when and how to hold elections.” “Due to their primitive and poor thinking the Belarusians would never be able to solve this issue on their own. As a token of incredible appreciation, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs is ready to fast-track Her Excellency's application for Belarusian citizenship in order to include her in the electoral roll and give her the right to vote. This can also be done without Belarusian citizenship using some digital platform recognized by Julie Fisher,” the ministry quipped.

“We cannot ignore the USA's assistance with organizing the election. Such achievements of the American electoral system as voting by mail and the Electoral College instead of direct voting can be useful and should be explored by Belarus,” the press service noted. “We are deeply touched by the attention of the United States to Belarus' life. In response we can make a selfless contribution to the development of Alaska's agriculture and effective development of its lands. We are ready to look into the possibility of shared control over Alaska. We could also send Belarusian construction crews based in the region to share experience and help residents of the southern states deal with the aftermath of the natural disaster,” the press service pointed out.

"We sincerely wish the entire American people unity and smooth ascension up the ladder of the American dream. We hope that the positive trend in our relations will continue and we will live to see the moment when we can welcome the U.S. Sixth Fleet near the sea shores of Belarus!” the press service concluded.

From BelTA's editorial office: “It is obvious that the commentary of the Ministry of Foreign Ministry's press service should be taken with humor, as ironic trolling of the United States. The commentary uses some phrases from the statement of the U.S. Embassy in Minsk in connection with the 103rd anniversary of the declaration of the Belarusian People's Republic of 1918. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs press service has mirrored these statements to reflect upon the current realities in the United States, the existing division of the society and related issues. Belarus has always advocated the principle of non-interference in the internal affairs of other countries, which a number of foreign countries do not mind doing.

 

 

 

Thursday, March 25, 2021

NATO Headquarters: Blinken announces last global crusade – Anti-bellum

NATO Headquarters: Blinken announces last global crusade – Anti-bellum

 

Nice country ya got there.  Wouldn't want to see anything happen to it. -- NATO

What You Call Love Is Unpaid Work: The Twelfth Newsletter (2021)

https://www.thetricontinental.org/newsletterissue/11-care-work/

Excerpt: 

Women and girls, the ILO study shows, carry out three quarters of the unpaid care work that is required to maintain families and society. If those who perform unpaid care work received the minimum wage in their respective countries, the wage bill would amount to US$11 trillion (or up to roughly 15% of global Gross Domestic Product, the size of the total digital economy). The necessity of this unpaid care work – including taking care of children and the elderly – has prevented women, and some men, from entering the paid workforce. In 2018, according to the ILO, 606 million women said that unpaid care work meant that they could not seek paid employment outside the home; 41 million men said the same thing.

Saturday, March 20, 2021

#FreeAssange Telethon​ w/ Chris Hedges, Rania Khalek, John Kiriakou, Lee...

How President of Russia Responded to President of USA's Comments

 

http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/65172


International Music Festival volunteer coordinator and representative of Crimea Federal University Polina Bolbochan: Mr President, I have a somewhat personal question for you. Yesterday, President Biden got quite tough in his interview, including with regard to you. What would you say to him?

Vladimir Putin: With regard to my US colleague’s remark, we have, indeed, as he said, met in person. What would I tell him? I would say “stay healthy.” I wish him good health. I am saying this without irony or tongue in cheek. This is my first point.

Secondly, taking a broader approach to this matter, I would like to say that difficult, dramatic, and bloody events abound in the history of every nation and every state. But when we evaluate other people, or even other states and nations, we are always facing a mirror, we always see ourselves in the reflection, because we project our inner selves onto the other person.

You know, I remember when we were children and played in the yard, we had arguments occasionally and we used to say: whatever you call me is what you are called yourself. This is no coincidence or just a kids’ saying or joke. It has a very deep psychological undercurrent. We always see ourselves in another person and think that he or she is just like us, and evaluate the other person’s actions based on our own outlook on life.

With regard to the US establishment, the ruling class – not the American people who are mostly honest, decent and sincere people who want to live in peace and friendship with us, something we are aware of and appreciate, and we will rely on them in the future – their mindset was formed in rather challenging circumstances which we are all aware of. After all, the colonisation of the American continent by the Europeans went hand-in-hand with the extermination of the local people, the genocide, as they say today, outright genocide of the Indian tribes followed by a very tough, long and difficult period of slavery, a very cruel period. All of that has been part of life in America throughout the history of the United States to this day. Otherwise, where would the Black Lives Matter movement come from? To this day, African Americans face injustice and even extermination.

The ruling class of the United States tends to address domestic and foreign policy issues based on these assumptions. After all, the United States is the only country to have used nuclear weapons, mind you, against a non-nuclear state – Japan, in Hiroshima and Nagasaki at the end of WW II. There was absolutely no military need for the bombing. It was nothing but the extermination of civilians. I am bringing this up, because I know that the United States and its leaders are determined to maintain certain relations with us, but on matters that are of interest to the United States and on its terms. Even though they believe we are just like them, we are different. We have a different genetic, cultural and moral code. But we know how to uphold our interests. We will work with the United States, but in the areas that we are interested in and on terms that we believe are beneficial to us. They will have to reckon with it despite their attempts to stop our development, despite the sanctions and insults. They will have to reckon with this.

We, with our national interests in mind, will promote our relations with all countries, including the United States. This is generally all I want to say about this.

Friday, March 19, 2021

A Day in the Life of Abed Salama | by Nathan Thrall | The New York Review of Books

https://www.nybooks.com/daily/2021/03/19/a-day-in-the-life-of-abed-salama/

Recommended as a "must read" by Huwaida Arraf.  I agree, humbly.  (pretty long)

EXCERPTS:


Searching for a universal, non-Biblical justification for Israel’s existence, secular Zionists asserted that persecuted Jews had deserved a safe haven. But this argument contained a number of flaws. A need for refuge is not a license to dispossess. Zionists did not come to Palestine seeking to integrate into local society, but to establish their own exclusive state at the natives’ expense. The need for safe haven was not the original motivation for establishing a Jewish national home. As Michael Stanislawski, the Nathan J. Miller Professor of Jewish History at Columbia University, writes:

The all-too-frequent claim that modern Jewish nationalism was born in response to anti-Semitism or to the outbreak of violent attacks (“pogroms”) against the Jews which began in the Russian Empire in 1881–[18]82 is quite simply wrong: the first expressions of this new ideology were published well before the spread of the new anti-Semitic ideology and before the pogroms of the early 1880s. …the fundamental cause of the emergence of modern Jewish nationalism was the rise, on the part of Jews themselves, of new ideologies that applied the basic tenets of modern nationalism to the Jews, and not a response to persecution.

The original aim of modern Jewish nationalism was to prevent the assimilation of Jews into the nations in which they lived—the rescue of Jewish identity, not of Jews. When, in the period 1903–1905, the Zionist movement was presented with a choice between an actual, immediate refuge—offered by the British, in East Africa—and the pursuit of an uncertain dream in Zion, it was the argument for the latter that won. The pogroms that followed the rise of modern Jewish nationalism increased the attractiveness of Zionism for some Jews, but many more responded by immigrating to the United States. Even well after those pogroms began in 1881–1882, and until the end of the Holocaust, Zionism remained a minority movement, rejected by most rabbinic and lay leaders. Today, when Israeli flags are at the front of many American synagogues, it is easy to forget that during its first half-century, Zionism was a sect within a dissident sect: most Jews were not Jewish nationalists, and even many Jewish nationalists were not Zionists but members of the secular, socialist Bund, which called for Jewish autonomy in the places in which Jews resided, not in Palestine. Almost all the Jews who did seek to escape persecution chose to go elsewhere. From the start of Zionist settlement in 1882 to the outbreak of World War I, some 2.5 million Jews left Eastern Europe, mostly to America. Only 60,000 went to Palestine, of whom about 8,000 were committed Zionists—comprising less than 0.5 percent of the Eastern European Jewish emigration. More than half of these immigrants left Palestine.

***


The Israeli “peace camp,” contrary to what the country’s political right and the settlers claim, has no desire to turn Israel into a liberal, universalist state with equality for all its citizens. It seeks, in fact, to preserve Israel as a Jewish ethnocratic state. The peace that it proposes is less one of reconciliation than of separation. In the words of Yitzhak Rabin, “It is better for the Arabs not to be swarming around here.” Religious and right-wing Zionists see enormous hypocrisy in the left’s presentation of itself as a noble seeker of peace, with the settlers cast as villains. In the Yesha Council’s monthly magazine, Nekuda, Vered Noam, a Tel Aviv University professor of Talmud and winner of the Israel Prize, the country’s highest honor, described the Zionist left’s support for enclosing Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza behind fences and walls in this way:

The left views a barrier as a didactic means, an accelerator of the Jewish recognition of the need to separate between the populations, an exercise in Palestinian statehood.… However, the central motivation is not the concern for the civil rights of the Palestinians. The continued suffocation and starvation of two million people [in Gaza] does not sit well with such a concern.…the true stimulus of the left is separation from the Arabs. The closure [of Palestinian areas] exposes a surprising similarity between the majority of leftists and the extreme right which upholds the idea of transfer [of Palestinians to other countries]. The central aspiration of both is to dispose of Arab presence.

Every Israeli settlement plan—from the Allon to the Sharon, Drobles, and Super Zones plans—discarded most of the densely populated Palestinian cities in Gaza and the West Bank, leaving them to the Palestinians for self-rule. Israel wanted to take over Palestinian land only when it didn’t require absorbing too many of its non-Jewish inhabitants. This Israeli aversion to integrating urban Palestinian areas—where Israel has instead implemented its policy of hafrada, or segregation—is the foundation of worldwide belief in the possibility of a two-state solution. Prime Minister Netanyahu has repeatedly stated that “we don’t want to govern them,” and from this true statement a number of wild leaps have been made, most notably that autonomy in a handful of disconnected Palestinian cities can be stretched, bent, and twisted into a Palestinian state.

The Zionist left’s primary objection to annexation is that it would harm the goal of having as few Palestinians as possible within the borders of the Jewish state. One of the groups illustrating this was The People Against Annexation, formed in 2020. It was handsomely funded by a board member of the bipartisan pro-Israel lobbying group AIPAC, Stacy Schusterman, whose family foundation supports numerous Israel advocacy groups (in the 2020 election campaign, Schusterman donated $550,000 to defeat the Minnesota Congresswoman Ilhan Omar and more than $1.2 million to a pro-Israel group that ran ads against Senator Bernie Sanders). The People Against Annexation was headed by the former Israel director of J Street, the Democratic Party-aligned pro-Israel lobbying group in Washington, D.C. Among the ads produced by the organization was a poster demonizing Palestinians as Islamist terrorists by implying that annexation would mean renaming a Tel Aviv street after Sheikh Ahmad Yassin, the founder of the Islamic Resistance Movement, also known as Hamas. 

***

In Israel’s liberal, anti-settlement circles, it is often asserted that the Occupation is a terrible blight, an aberration from the democratic values of the first nineteen years of the state. In fact, those years provided the template for the segregation, land confiscation, ethnic domination, and separate legal regimes for Jews and Palestinians that characterize the present-day West Bank. In more than seventy-two years of statehood, there have been only six months when Israel did not place most of the native population under military rule while it confiscated their land and deprived those people of basic civil rights. 

Since 1967, Israel’s policy has been to have its occupied subjects pay for their own occupation, primarily through Israeli-collected taxes (though also through Israel’s extraction of natural resources). The army’s blueprint “Operational Principles for the Administered Territories,” published in the war’s aftermath, states that “the economy of the administered territories should weigh on the Israeli budget as little as possible.” Today, much of Israel’s occupation is underwritten by the United States—not only through the $3.8 billion the US gives Israel every year, but also through infrastructure projects in the West Bank that are paid for from a separate USAID budget. Ostensibly, this is for Palestinian development; in practice, it means that US taxpayers are subsidizing the infrastructure of ethnic segregation in areas that Israel is steadily colonizing. In 2013, the year that USAID upgraded the Jaba road in Area C, the organization spent $440 million in the occupied territories, $50 million of it on infrastructure. The US provided an additional $3.4 billion to the Israeli military that year. 


Wednesday, March 17, 2021

Tuesday, March 16, 2021

Thursday, March 11, 2021

Tuesday, March 09, 2021

US, Allies Drop 46 Bombs Per Day for 20 Years in Middle East and Africa

US, Allies Drop 46 Bombs Per Day for 20 Years in Middle East and Africa

 

  •  A resident carries the bodies of six people killed during fights between Iraq security forces and Islamic State on the western side of Mosul, Iraq, Friday, March 24, 2017. Residents of the Iraqi city's neighborhood known as Mosul Jidideh at the scene say that scores of residents are believed to have been killed by airstrikes that hit a cluster of homes in the area earlier this month (AP Photo/Felipe Dana)

    Residents carry the body of several civilians killed in a US airstrike in
    Mosul, Iraq on March 24, 2017. Felipe Dana | AP

     


    A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual death.  --  Martin Luther King Jr.



    And this was said in 1967.  I think we have overshot the spiritual death runway.





     

BTS "Dynamite" Official Music Video--This Will Cheer You Up!

Monday, March 08, 2021

"Is China Capitalist?" Vijay Prashad on Chinese Socialism | QIAO COLLECTIVE

Julian Assange - Google Is Not What It Seems [Old but explains why Empire is Loath to #FreeJulianAssange]

Julian Assange - Google Is Not What It Seems:

"Writing in 2013, Schmidt and Cohen stated, 'What Lockheed Martin was to the twentieth century, technology and cyber-security companies will be to the twenty-first.'"

Saturday, February 27, 2021

The Trouble With Uplift: How black politics succumbed to the siren song of the racial voice -- Adolph Reed

 

 https://thebaffler.com/salvos/the-trouble-with-uplift-reed

 Excerpt:

A curiously inflexible brand of race-first neoliberalism has taken root in American political discourse.

In order to legitimate what Michaels describes as “racial rent-seeking,” a curiously inflexible brand of race-first neoliberalism has taken root in American political discourse, proposing a trickle-down model of racial progress, anchored in the mysticism of organic black community. Against this exoticized backdrop, neoliberal race leaders stage the beguiling fantasy that individual “entrepreneurialism” is the key path to rising above one’s circumstances—i.e., the standard American social myth that obscures the deeper need to combat systemic inequalities. The most tragic, and pathetic, expressions of this faith are the versions of the “gospel of prosperity,” which fuse pop self-realization psychology and a barely recognizable Christianity to exploit desperation and the desire for life with dignity and respect among their black-majority congregations. The false hopes of the prosperity gospel encourage already vulnerable people to fall prey to all sorts of destructive get-rich-quick schemes; they are the “sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions” channeled through a market-idolatrous Protestant psychobabble. Black ministers and other proponents of entrepreneurialist ideology as racial uplift also played a largely unrecognized role in pushing subprime mortgages, and even payday loans, in black communities.

The racial trickle-down success myth is partly a vestige of an earlier era, during which individual black attainments could be seen as testaments to the race’s capacities—and a refutation of the white-sanctioned view of black people as generally inferior. Even then, however, this model of black uplift was enmeshed in the race theory of the time—notably the belief that a race’s capacities were indicated by the accomplishments of its “best” individuals—and it was always inflected with the class perspectives of those who saw themselves as such individuals. The class legacies of this foundational moment in modern black politics may well contribute to the firm insistence among today’s “black voices” that slavery and Jim Crow mark the transcendent truth of black Americans’ experience in the United States—and that an irreducible racism is the source of all manifest racial inequality. That diagnosis certainly masks class asymmetries among black Americans’ circumstances as well as in the remedies proposed to improve them.

Nevertheless, we continue to indulge the politically wrong-headed, counterproductive, and even reactionary features of the “representative black voice” industry in whatever remains of our contemporary public sphere. And we never reckon with the truly disturbing presumption that any black person who can gain access to the public microphone and performs familiar rituals of “blackness” should be recognized as expressing significant racial truths and deserves our attention. This presumption rests on the unexamined premise that blacks share a common, singular mind that is at once radically unknowable to non-blacks and readily downloaded by any random individual setting up shop as a racial voice. And despite what all of our age’s many heroic narratives of individualist race-first triumph may suggest to the casual viewer, that premise is the essence of racism.

Adolph Reed is a professor of political science at the University of Pennsylvania

 

Fred Hampton, internationalism, and Palestine: an interview with Jeffrey Haas – Mondoweiss

Fred Hampton, internationalism, and Palestine: an interview with Jeffrey Haas – Mondoweiss: Movement attorney Jeffrey Haas discusses his work exposing the police and FBI murder of Black Panther leader Fred Hampton, and his commitment to supporting Palestinian liberation.

***
EXCERPT:

AJP: You do Palestine organizing in New Mexico. How did you get involved in being a Palestine solidarity organizer? 

Jeffrey Haas

JH: It was a natural development because the Panthers talked about human rights and equal rights and so when you’re open to that, you really don’t want to accept injustice anywhere. I had grown up in a reform Jewish congregation in Atlanta that wasn’t particularly Zionist, but we had heard all the myths about “if we give money, we’re planting trees to make the desert bloom,” not to hide what had been done to Palestinian villages. As I and many others took up the liberation struggles of Central Americans fighting for liberation, the issue of Palestine came up directly when we learned about what was happening in Guatemala. The corrupt junta was killing and putting masses of indigenous people in internment camps aided directly by the state of Israel. Why was Israel doing the dirty work of the US? Why did Israel continue to support the apartheid government in South Africa to the very end? It became clear that Israel was an apartheid state itself and had not only sided with other authoritarian colonial oppressors, but sought to benefit financially by selling the surveillance and military technology they used to repress the Palestinian people to other colonial and imperialist powers.

With the first attacks on Gaza in 2014, I helped organize a group called Another Jewish Voice of Santa Fe. There was also Another Jewish Voice of Albuquerque and we joined together. We continue to organize and raise issues, to protest as Santa Feans For Justice in Palestine. We put up some very explicit artwork on a very public wall depicting Israeli atrocities to Palestinian youth a year ago and raised a lot of awareness . . . and not unsurprisingly got some Zionist backlash.  We worked closely with the Red Nation because they are frequently drawing the connection between the struggles of Native Americans and the struggles of Palestinians against colonialism. A lot of the techniques, military gear and devices that Israel uses against  Palestinians have been taught to and acquired by  US law enforcement  and used against the Black movement in Ferguson and the indigenous-led Water Protectors at Standing Rock.

 

Friday, February 26, 2021