Covid

MASKING SAVES LIVES

Tuesday, May 02, 2006

No War on Immigrants (or Iraq or Iran)
















While I think the Stand Up Seattle banner [Rights for Workers, Not Corporations with a small "Kill Nafta" thrown in] at the Seattle Immigrants' March was great (and I'm sure we'll have pictures soon), this is a great sign from the San Jose march.

From Eli Stephens at Left I on the News--he took this picture himself at the San Jose march. His article there has more details.

The Anti-Bush Anarchist

"I'm not some sort of conspiracy theorist," Monson says of his political leanings. "I'm not talking about how the government is trying to hide UFOs. I just want to do away with hierarchy. I'm saying that our economic system, capitalism, is structured so that it only benefits a small percentage of very wealthy people. When I was traveling in Brazil, they had us staying at a really posh hotel. Outside the hotel there was a mom sleeping on the sidewalk with her two kids. That's when reality hits you. What did that woman ever do? Who did she ever hurt?"

I want this guy in my corner--and he could be. He's from around here.

From Alternet via Cursor.org.

Deflater in Chief: Stephen Colbert Does the White House

Then he [Stephen Colbert] turned to the president of the United States, who sat tight-lipped just a few feet away. "I stand by this man. I stand by this man because he stands for things. Not only for things, he stands on things. Things like aircraft carriers and rubble and recently flooded city squares. And that sends a strong message, that no matter what happens to America, she will always rebound -- with the most powerfully staged photo ops in the world."

Found on Cursor.org.

Anyone who didn't see the skewering described above can watch it here (well worth it):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lcIRXur61II

UPDATE:
It appears the mainstream media (including of course our "paper of record," the NYTimes) totally blacked-out any coverage of Stephen Colbert's brilliant performance above.

Also, from Cursor.org, here is a Media Matters article about this self-censorship. http://mediamatters.org/items/printable/200605010005

Universal Healthcare Anyone?

CHICAGO — Middle-aged, white Americans are much sicker than their counterparts in England, startling new research shows, despite U.S. health care spending per person that is more than double what Britain spends.

From Seattle Times.

Sunday, April 30, 2006

An Interview with Camilo Meija--War and Immigrants Rights: "It's the Same System Behind Both Injustices"

These movements aren't separate from another, and that's very important.

Former United Nations weapons inspector Scott Ritter said that the antiwar movement needs to be laser-focused on being antiwar, and not talking about other issues. I think that's a mistake, and that's one of the things that we have to appreciate about both the antiwar and immigrant rights movements.

Another great article from Information Clearinghouse.


Turkey Refuses U.S. Request To Allow Attack On Iran From Turkish Base

Turkish Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul said Sunday that his country refused a request from the United States to attack Iran from its Air Force base in Incirlik, despite the U.S. offer of a nuclear reactor, according to a report in Al Biyan.

Now that's what I call irony.

Guantanamo Bay Prisoners Plant Seeds of Hope in Secret Garden

With their bare hands and the most basic of tools, prisoners at Guantanamo Bay have fashioned a secret garden where they have grown plants from seeds recovered from their meals. For some of the detainees - held without charge for more than four years and who the US say are now cleared for release - the garden apparently offers a diversion from the monotony and injustice of their imprisonment.

From the Independent, via Angry Arab Newservice.

Israel's Nukes: Don't Ask, Don't Tell

It is especially striking to compare the Nixon administration's stance toward Israel in 1969 with the way that Washington is trying to accommodate India in 2006. As problematic as the proposed nuclear deal with New Delhi is, it at least represents an effort to deal openly with the issue, rather than sweeping it under the rug. Without open acknowledgment of Israel's nuclear status, by Israel itself and by the rest of the world, such ideas as a nuclear-free Middle East, or even the inclusion of Israel in an updated NPT regime, cannot even be discussed properly. [40]

It is time for a new deal to replace the old Nixon-Meir understandings of 1969, with Israel telling the truth and in so doing finally normalizing its nuclear affairs.

Found on Angry Arab Newservice.


Saturday, April 29, 2006

Camejo on Stump For CA Gov: We Need A Third Party

Camejo described Democrats and Republicans as two faces of the same coin. "The worst is the Democrats," he said. "The Republicans are just wrong. They say what they believe. The Democrats -- their job is to get you to accept the Republican platform."

"That's why we need a third party," he said. Most registered Democrats hold the values of the Green Party, and they aren't represented by the Democratic leadership, he added.

Found on Marxmail.org



IAEA Finds No Proof of Iranian Nuclear Weapons Program

Despite not being fully in compliance with these demands, Iran maintains that it is in fact fulfilling its obligations under the Nuclear non-Proliferation Treaty.

The IAEA found no smoking gun.


Per Juan Cole on Information Clearinghouse.

Interesting Take on Tomorrow's Save Darfur Rally in DC

It's embarrassing that America -- and the world -- will be witnessing a PRO-WAR rally in Washington, D.C. on April 30 (a project of SaveDarfur.org) that is far more highly publicized than an anti-war one (that appears to be poorly organized) in New York City on April 29, even while Washington is still soldiering on in Afghanistan and Iraq and gunning for sanctions or war on Iran.

Really, the LAST THING we need in America is ONE MORE WAR to get involved in -- the least of all in an oil state like Sudan (amidst loud complaints of higher gas prices, no less).

From Yoshie Furuhashie in Monthly Review zine.


Extemely Interesting Historical Lists of US Global Interventions

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/usinterventionism.html

Read it if you dare!

Found on Marxmail.org

Thousands March in NY to Demand Immediate Withdrawal & No War on Iran


NEW YORK -- A day after the military announced that April was the deadliest month for U.S. forces in Iraq this year, thousands of anti-war demonstrators marched Saturday through lower Manhattan to demand an immediate withdrawal of troops

Picture is from different article on Reuters. Much the same content. Picture found on What Really Happened.com

Iran Gives Ground As Sanctions Loom


FACING the growing likelihood of United Nations sanctions, Iran said yesterday it was willing to resume allowing snap atomic inspections but would not yield to demands that it abandon uranium enrichment.

Speaking after the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency released its finding that Iran had breached its international obligations, Mohammad Saeedi, deputy head of Iran's Atomic Energy Organisation, said his country would allow inspections if its case were dropped by the UN Security Council and passed back to the agency.

From an article in The Age. Not sure whether President Ahmadinejad is signaling "peace" or "victory" here.

Friday, April 28, 2006

Kerry Sponsors Collective Punishment of Palestinians on Behalf of Israel

"As a former state prosecutor and lieutenant governor whose father was a Foreign Service officer, the former Presidential candidate Senator John Forbes Kerry should know a violation of international law when he sees one. Perhaps he could blame intimidation by the American Israeli PAC organization or a need to pander to his Jewish benefactors as he makes another run for the Presidency, but Kerry’s recent co-sponsorship of the Palestinian Compliance Act of 2006 is a violation of Article 33 of the Fourth Geneva Convention that forbids collective punishment and states "that a person shall not be punished for an offense he or she has not personally committed. This article explicitly relates to administrative punishment imposed on persons or groups because of acts that they did not personally commit. Article 50 of the Hague Regulations states a comparable prohibition."

Only 21 Reps Vote Against Iran Sanctions--US/Israel Attack Looms

FROM ANTIWAR.COM

"Let no one say they were against this war with Iran, when it comes, if they didn't vote with the heroic 21 naysayers. These sanctions against Iran are but a prelude to war, just as sanctions were the first step in the long run-up to the invasion of Iraq. However, we may not enjoy such a lengthy interval between cause and effect this time around. Events are proceeding at an ever accelerating pace, with Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice now saying the time for talking is over and the time for action has begun – not military action (at least not yet), but action by the Security Council of the United Nations, whose "credibility is at stake." I wonder if that same standard applies to the many UN resolutions that Israel continues to defy. Hasn't the UN already lost all credibility when such brazen defiance has gone unnoticed by the Security Council?"

"Let no one say they weren't warned. Using Iraq as a "model" for the methodology of the War Party, we can see, when it comes to Iran, that all the elements are falling neatly into place. Once again, we have the specter of WMD and their possible existence or nonexistence: a mirage projected by the credulous Western "mainstream" media, one that is sure to dissipate only after we're waist-deep in an Iranian quagmire. Another familiar phenomenon: dubious exile groups, along the lines of the infamous Iraqi National Congress, only this time even wackier, wilder, and woolier."

Tuesday, April 25, 2006

Your 2005 Ten Worst Corporations of the Year!

The corporations will never give up power, unless forced to do so by the people.
Where to start?
No better place than the 10 worst corporations of 2005, presented herewith in alphabetical order:

For example, here's some info on BP Oil Company:

"In March, 15 workers were incinerated, and more than 170 injured, following an explosion at BP’s sprawling refinery in Texas City, Texas.

It was the third fatal accident at the Texas City BP facility in the last four years.

In September 2004, two workers were burned to death and another was seriously injured.

In 2001, a maintenance worker at the facility died after falling into a tank that had been shut down. Nationwide, BP’s facilities have had more than 3,565 accidents since 1990, ranking first in the nation, according to a 2004 report by the Texas Public Interest Research Group (TexPIRG).

BP has admitted it was at fault in the Texas City explosion. “We regret that our mistakes have caused so much suffering,” said Ross Pillari, president of BP Products North America, after the company had completed an interim investigation in May."

Of course, there will be no criminal investigation. These were all just "accidents."

Found on Common Dreams.org

Transforming the World into a War-Zone--Rumsfeld's Army

"Like everything else, Rumsfeld’s promise to “transform” the military has been a lie. The Defense Secretary never had any intention of converting the military into “smaller, more agile units”. From the very onset his goal has been to create a global strike-force that operates as the enforcement-arm of the multinational corporations."

******

"Even Rumsfeld apologists are probably shocked at the breadth and arrogance of this sinister plan. The military is being hijacked in full view of the American people and turned into the world’s most-lethal security apparatus. Under Rumsfeld’s direction, special units operating clandestinely around the globe will perform criminal renditions, assassinations, sabotage, and acts of piracy all in the name of corporate profiteering."


MIKE WHITNEY IN AL JAZEERA VIA CURSOR.ORG

Democrats Speak with Forked Tongues

"Before and after the invasion of 2003, anti-war Democrats have argued with me about the merits of the Democratic Party. I have heard, and continue to hear, every lame excuse in the book about the party acquiescing to the warmongers from "They had bad information" to "That’s not their real position." Facts are facts. The Democrats allowed George Bush to invade Iraq for one reason: they were afraid that if the U.S. attacked Iraq and that the soldiers were welcomed with flowers and candy, they would have been on the wrong side of the issue and would have been considered anti-American. No matter how they talk today, Madeleine Albright, John Kerry, and many other Democrats allowed the invasion to occur. Integrity, research and truth went out the window.

Despite all their current anti-war talk, there is one aspect missing from the hollow mouths of the Democrats: not one has mentioned the plight of the Iraqi people and the hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilian deaths and the destruction of the country that came about because of their silence."

Having just watched the snake Kerry give the speech referred to above, the utter cynicism is mindblowing. He talks about Iraqis resisting our invasion as being participants in the global war on terror, which he wants to continue fighting--although he would of course do it better than Bush.

If the antiwar movement latches on to Kerry again as their representative--I was going to say they would be in for a rude awakening--but I don't think they've awakened from their last dream yet. So odds are here we go again. Kerry for President--The Guy Who Can Do Bush's War Better.

FROM URUKNET.INFO

Sunday, April 23, 2006

Hillary's Competition Positions Himself on Iraq (Again)

"How do you ask a man to be the last man to die for a mistake?" Kerry said in 1971, a line that helped propel the decorated Navy combat veteran and Yale graduate onto the national stage.

The same question applies today as Americans wrestle with the mounting death toll in Iraq, Kerry said, speaking before about 500 supporters who punctuated his speech at least 20 times with ovations.

"Lives have been lost to bad decisions," Kerry said. "Not decisions that could have gone either way, but decisions that constitute basic negligence and incompetence. And lives continue to be lost because of stubbornness and pride."

Will anyone ask him to explain how and when he came to this conclusion? How many people have died needlessly because he voted for the Iraq war resolution and then ran for president on a platform of sending MORE troops to Iraq.

When he is elected and brings the troops back from Iraq, will he be sending them to Iran, as he hinted in a statement he made a couple of weeks ago?