Covid

MASKING SAVES LIVES

Friday, May 27, 2022

Beyond the Official Clichés: The Texas School Shooting Reveals the Advanced Sickness of American Society--WSWS.org

 

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2022/05/27/cfnq-m27.html

The mass shooting of 19 children and two teachers, and the wounding of 17 more people, at the Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas on Tuesday was a genuinely horrific event. The students killed were 9, 10 and 11 years old, in the second, third and fourth grades. The adults killed, both women, were fourth-grade teachers. The perpetrator of the crime barricaded himself inside a classroom and opened fire with a lightweight semi-automatic rifle that he had obtained a day after his 18th birthday, one week earlier.

In the most immediate and direct sense, hundreds if not thousands of people will never recover from the damage done in this one incident alone.

The American ruling elite, its politicians and its media outlets, have nothing insightful or useful to say about this most recent calamity. Depending on party affiliation and the level of individual ignorance, they advocate gun control, more police repression or a return to godliness.

Crime scene tape surrounds Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas, Wednesday, May 25, 2022. [AP Photo/Jae C. Hong]

One had the sense that even President Joe Biden recognized that the normal assortment of clichés would only anger people and perhaps he had better keep his mouth shut. Biden briefly referred to the fact “these kinds of mass shootings rarely happen anywhere else in the world.” People in other countries, he said, “have mental health problems. They have domestic disputes in other countries. They have people who are lost,” but such killings “never happen [elsewhere] with the kind of frequency that they happen in America. Why?” Of course, he was unable to answer his own question, except by referring to the “gun lobby,” which explains precisely nothing.

Uvalde is a town of 15,000 people, 80 percent of them Hispanic or Latino, many of them poor, 80 miles west of San Antonio and 55 miles east of the Mexico-US border. But there is no “predictor” provided here by size, location, economics or ethnicity.

Mass shootings and other forms of anti-social violence are endemic to American society.

The statistical evidence is overwhelming, and appalling. The Gun Violence Archive has registered 214 mass shootings already in the first five months of 2022—including nine in the past week in nine different states. Overall, more than 17,000 people have died in incidents involving gun violence so far this year, through approximately 7,600 homicides and 9,600 suicides.

On the other hand, the Mass Shooting Tracker—pity the poor country that needs such a measurement!—lists 253 mass shootings in 2022, or 1.73 a day, resulting in 303 people being killed and 1,029 wounded.

According to that same source, in Pell City, Alabama last week, a gunman “fatally shot his wife & two daughters, ages 13 and 16” and “died from self-inflicted gunshot.” In another incident, in Goshen, Indiana, on May 21, the “gunman shot 4 siblings, killing a 17-yr-old boy & wounding at least 2 other juveniles.” The perpetrator was then “killed.”

Other related figures are worth noting. The suicide rate in the US increased between 1999 and 2019 by 33 percent. “There were nearly 46,000 deaths by suicide in 2020, making it the 12th-leading cause of death in the United States. According to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), that same year, 12.2 million adults seriously thought about suicide, 3.2 million made a plan and 1.2 million attempted suicide in the past year.” (America’s Health Rankings)

Violence to oneself and to others mounts on every side. Some 108,000 people died in the US from a drug overdose in 2021, also a sharp rise. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration estimates 43,000 people died in motor vehicle traffic crashes in 2021, a 10.5 percent increase over 2020. The COVID-19 pandemic, as a result of homicidal government policy, has led to the deaths of more than 1 million men, women and children in the US since early 2020.

No honest observer, taking account of these numbers and the vast human tragedy that speaks through them, could possibly conclude that the Uvalde incident and others like it are merely isolated, individual episodes. Rather, they reveal a far-reaching, far-advanced social sickness.

“The suspect [in Uvalde] attended a local high school and lived with his grandparents,” CNN reports blandly, typically. “He had no friends and had no criminal history or gang affiliation. … He worked the day shift at a local Wendy’s [fast food restaurant] and kept mostly to himself, the restaurant's manager confirmed.” There was no obvious warning sign, until it was too late.

In New York City, in April, a man fired dozens of rounds in a subway car, wounding 10 people. In January, a woman was pushed onto the subway tracks in New York to her death. Last Sunday, a gunman shot and killed a 48-year-old Goldman Sachs employee “without provocation” while the man “was riding a Manhattan subway train to brunch,” according to police. “Completely random,” the cops added.

There are thousands of such “random” incidents a year. To push a total stranger off a subway platform—how is such a thing possible in a modern society?

But a society at war with itself, an enraged society, with a high level of depersonalized hatred …

The social conditions, including inequality and the concentration of immense wealth in a few hands, the endless wars, police brutality and murder, the indifferent official response to the deadly pandemic, all of this sets the general stage.

However, it is necessary to be concrete, historically and socially. The levels and varieties of animosity and resentment have not merely developed spontaneously, on the basis of the social crisis or even the outburst of official violence. The specific evolution of American society over the past number of decades needs to be considered.

In the first place, the US establishment, as part of its efforts at self-preservation, specializes in the stirring up of antagonisms, racial, ethnic, religious, political and more. The government and its accomplices in the media are always at work along these lines, seeking out scapegoats, poisoning the atmosphere. The “Japs,” the “commies,” “illegal aliens,” “pedophiles,” “Arab terrorists,” the list goes on and on.

Now, of course, the source of America’s problems lies with the “Russians.” If one could only rid this country’s stages, playing fields and airwaves of Russian opera singers, musicians, pop performers, athletes and more, life would return to its previously unspoiled and idyllic state. There is a continuous push to condition the population into viewing events and problems in terms of personal enemies. Every man is an island!

James G. Stavridis, retired US Navy admiral, currently Vice Chair, Global Affairs and Managing Director of the powerful global investment firm the Carlyle Group, Chair of the Board of Trustees of the Rockefeller Foundation and advocate of military aggression against Russia and China, tweeted on Thursday, “If you are only 18 and desperate to get your hands on an assault rifle—enlist in the @USMC [US Marine Corps]. If you can get in, they will teach you how to use one to protect the country—not to threat[en] its children.”

The criminal fomenting and manipulation of resentment toward supposed external and internal tormentors intersects dangerously with an intense degree of social alienation.

This has grown worse over the past several decades, but it is not a new phenomenon. Since the launch of the WSWS in 1998, which coincided with one of the first waves of school shootings in the US, even before the Columbine massacre in April 1999, we have been pointing to and warning about this trend.

In late May 1998, following a mass shooting in Springfield, Oregon and a number of other episodes, in an article headlined, “Alienation, adolescence and violence,” the WSWS argued that no headway would be made in grasping the truth about the tragedies unless they were viewed “as the outcome of a complex interaction between social life and individual psychology.”

We noted that a concerted ideological campaign had been mounted against the conception that environment played a significant role in shaping the individual, including the criminal and the emotionally disturbed person. “Instead the model advanced,” the WSWS wrote, “is that of the isolated individual who must make his way entirely unaided in the world, and whose value as a human being is determined by the degree of success he has selling his abilities in the marketplace.”

The WSWS pointed out almost exactly 24 years ago that alienation in social relations had “reached new heights. What does this mean concretely? Individuals increasingly feel themselves cut off from their fellow beings and indeed perceive other people as alien and even hostile to them. What does it take to kill another person, or group of people, as happened in Oregon? The youth [in Springfield] reportedly shot four bullets into the body of a fellow student lying at his feet. This must mean that he no longer recognized his victim as someone like him, as one of his kind. Without, of course, consciously intending to, official society has encouraged such mental states.”

Every effort has been made, the article went on, “to cultivate a soulless society governed entirely by money and profit, to eradicate the elementary concern one human being feels for another. Intellectual life, culture, the pursuit of knowledge for the benefit of mankind as a whole, are held in low esteem. Individualism, greed and ruthlessness are venerated. This has had a material impact on the quality of human relationships.”

There is nothing to take back from these remarks. On the contrary, all the retrograde tendencies have deepened and worsened in the intervening decades. A gaping, ever-enlarging political, moral and cultural vacuum occupies the center of American society. The population faces desperate social conditions without a helping hand, indeed the ruling oligarchy makes a provocative platform out of its social indifference, constantly and publicly doing everything in its power to undermine empathy.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, official policies have worked to weaken people’s concern with whether they get the disease—or whether others do. With some, a disturbing fatalism settles in. Expressions of solidarity are seen as a sign of weakness. Many are simply not equipped to cope with the complex medical and psychological dilemmas posed by the pandemic.

And the American ruling class dares to tell the rest of the world how to live!

US capitalism has exhausted itself, it is terminally ill and there is no physician to be found in or around the establishment. The widespread sentiment is developing, propelled by events such as the Uvalde disaster, that things cannot go on this way. The idea may not yet be a politically or socially articulate one, but it is occurring to masses of people that “this has gone too far. This cannot continue.”

And yet, at the same time, people may also think, “There doesn’t seem to be a way out of this.” But life, objective conditions are moving, shifting, maturing.

What will change things? Above all, the emergence of a social movement of a resolutely anti-establishment and anti-capitalist character. Such a movement provides a progressive, healthy outlet for the collective anger. It is not just a matter of argumentation, such a movement arises out of the experience of broad layers.

The class struggle, the conflict of millions of workers against the circumstances of their lives, is already transforming the circumstances. The socialist movement of the working class, based on an understanding of social life and its laws, and its potential, drives away despair and inspires hope. A revolutionary explosion is building up.

Wednesday, May 25, 2022

US Targets UN Visit to Xinjiang China With Today's "WMD" Lies

Even More Relevant Today: "The Columbine High School Massacre: American Pastoral ... American Berserk"

 

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/1999/04/colo-a27.html

Columbine High School appeared to be, at least in the view of its administrators and the county school board, such a lovely place for young people to grow up and learn. In its official profile, the institution boasted of its 'excellent facilities' and 'long history of excellence in all areas.' Nothing seemed to be lacking--Honors and Advanced Placement classes, foreign language instruction in Spanish, French and German, and an artistic program that included ceramics, sculpture, acting, choir and no less than five bands and one ensemble. There were even 'Cross-categorical programs for students with significantly limited intellectual capacity.' And, of course, there was no shortage of athletics.

'Stretch for Excellence' was the motto adopted by the school. And its mission statement--over which, one must assume, various well-meaning people labored--promised that Columbine High School 'will teach, learn, and model life skills and attitudes that prepare us to: work effectively with people; show courtesy to others; prepare for change; think critically; act responsibly; and respect our surroundings.'

Columbine, with its six guidance counselors, accountability committee, dozens of peer mediators and techniques for 'conflict resolution,' and an ethos of 'collaborative partnership' with parents, viewed itself as a 'twenty-first century high school.' The surrounding neighborhoods were prosperous, with housing from the low to high six-figures, numerous shopping malls and high-tech workplaces. But on April 20, 1999, Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold walked into Columbine High School armed with assault rifles and pipe bombs. By the time their bloody rampage was over, they had killed twelve students, one teacher, and themselves.

There have been, during the past two years, other school shootings that have resulted in the death of students. But as terrible as the earlier incidents at Pearl, West Paducah, Jonesboro and Springfield, the carnage at Columbine was of a qualitatively different scope and scale.

Harris and Klebold manufactured dozens of pipe bombs, stashed explosives in the school kitchen, studied the layout and traffic pattern to insure the largest number of victims, and chose Hitler's birthday as the date for the attack, in the course of nearly a year of preparation. Their intention was to kill as many students as possible and blow up the entire school with a propane bomb. Had they had the opportunity, Harris and Klebold would have continued their rampage beyond the school. According to the diary that one of the youth left behind, they hoped to hijack an airplane and crash it into the center of New York City. Only an unexpected encounter with a school guard and the failure of the bomb to explode thwarted their plan. Harris and Klebold then fled to the school library where they proceeded to select their victims before killing themselves.

What Harris and Klebold did on Tuesday was horrible, brutal and criminal. But these words are only descriptions of their acts, not explanations.

As usual, the media has nothing to offer by way of analysis. It is extraordinarily adept at milking the grief of the parents and community for every possible rating dollar. But those who wish to understand the underlying causes of this tragedy will find nothing of value on the network news.

After a few perfunctory tears for the victims, the media is looking for someone to blame. The parents, judging from the remarks of state officials, are being singled out as the most likely target for public vengeance. Perhaps they do bear some level of responsibility, but singling out for exemplary punishment these grief-stricken mothers and fathers--whose own lives have been utterly shattered by what their sons did last week--seems not only cruel, but deceitful and hypocritical.

After all, the parents of Klebold and Harris were not the only ones who failed to recognize and act on signs of the coming disaster. Columbine High School administrators apparently ignored repeated warnings they received about the boys' potential for violence.

This is not an individual failing, but one common to all the major institutions of American society: governments, political parties, corporations, the media, schools, churches, and trade unions. All are essentially oblivious to the mounting social tensions, until they erupt into homicidal violence at a post office, a high school, a McDonald's restaurant, a commuter railroad train, or inside the US Capitol.

Then these outbreaks are invariably treated, not as a social phenomenon, but as a police problem, to be handled by installing metal detectors, more police, more surveillance cameras, and enlisting the population as collaborators to inform on those with a supposed propensity to violence.

There's endless talk about 'parents taking responsibility for their children,' and of 'children taking responsibility for themselves.' But there is nothing said about the responsibility which American society has for a tragedy like that which occurred at Columbine.

It is almost grotesque to treat the Columbine HS massacre as merely the product of the breakdown of parental authority and supervision. Neither parents nor high school guidance counselors are equipped to deal with the societal dysfunction that found such devastating expression in the rampage of Klebold and Harris.

Consider, for a moment, the social outlook of these two youth. They were admirers of Adolf Hitler, fascinated by fascism's racism, its cult of sadistic violence and death, and its general contempt for humanity. And yet, there was nothing particularly Germanic about the views of Harris and Klebold. In a statement that he posted on his web site, Harris wrote: 'I am the law, if you don't like it you die. If I don't like you or I don't like what you want me to do, you die.'

These sentiments, expressed with a little more polish, sum up the approach of the American government to the rest of the world. 'Do what we want or we'll destroy you.' As we reread the lines of Harris, in the aftermath of the Columbine massacre, we recognize the brutality of a potential killer. But what, then, are we to see in the words written last Friday by the highly paid and celebrated columnist of the New YorkTimes, Thomas Friedman?:

'While there are many obvious downsides to war-from-15,000 feet, it does have one great strength--its sustainability. NATO can carry on this sort of air war for a long, long time. The Serbs need to remember that....

'But if NATO's only strength is that it can bomb forever, then it has to get every ounce out of that. Let's at least have a real air war.... It should be lights out in Belgrade: every power grid, water pipe, road and war-related factory has to be targeted.

'Like it or not, we are at war with the Serbian nation (they certainly think so), and the stakes have to be very clear: Every week you ravage Kosovo is another decade we will set your country back by pulverizing you. You want 1950? We can do 1950. You want 1389? We can do 1389 too.'

Harris and Klebold did not have to study Mein Kampf to find special 'inspiration' for their actions. The editorials and columns that appear in American newspapers, not to mention the vicious outpourings on talk radio, would do just as well. And here we come to the crucial paradox that finds expression in their assault on Columbine High. It is likely that Harris and Klebold viewed themselves as rebels against society. In this they were quite mistaken. Certainly, the venue of their action was unconventional. But the deed itself represented an extreme application of the selfish and inhumane attitudes that are commonplace in American society today.

First, their violent outburst was not conceived of as a response to social injustice. Rather, Harris and Klebold took revenge against what they perceived as personal slights. They did not act on behalf of others, but for themselves. Further, they attacked not a symbol of oppression, but defenseless children and a well-meaning teacher. And finally, even if one were to accept that these two boys had been harassed at school, the scale of their violence was out of all proportion to the injury they had suffered. Their aim was not to right a wrong, but to create as much pain and suffering as possible.

What Harris and Klebold did was monstrous. But does it help to portray them as monsters? They were, let us not forget, only teenagers. Youth is supposedly a time of hope and idealism. How, then, was it possible that so much hate could be accumulated by these youth in so short a time? And not only hate, but utter despair as well. In their own minds, they had many reasons to kill, but none to live.

They plotted this deed, but were they its only authors? They are, in the final analysis, the products of a particular time and place. However terrible its consequences, the mad rampage of Harris and Klebold has deep social roots. Of course, the political leaders and the media elite do not care to delve too deeply into the social pathology of this dreadful crime. It would require that they hold a mirror up to themselves.

Since the Littleton killings, the media is full of commentary from psychologists, ministers, priests, police and experts of all sorts, gravely enumerating the 'warning signs' which may alert parents to the possibility that their teenage son or daughter may be a potential mass murderer: Is your child depressed, discouraged, anxious, over-stressed, uncommunicative, disinterested, addicted to computer games, subject to mood swings, getting consistently bad grades, worrying too much about maintaining consistently high grades, etc.? At least 75 percent of all American children express one if not more of these characteristics.

In reality, the concentration on individual warning signs will be of little help in preventing further tragedies. Attention should be focused, rather, on the social warning signs, that is, the indications and indices of social and political dysfunction which create the climate that produces events like the Columbine HS massacre. Vital indicators of impending disaster might include: growing polarization between wealth and poverty; atomization of working people and the suppression of their class identity; the glorification of militarism and war; the absence of serious social commentary and political debate; the debased state of popular culture; the worship of the stock exchange; the unrestrained celebration of individual success and personal wealth; the denigration of the ideals of social progress and equality.

What is happening to America's kids? This is a question posed by Philip Roth in his provocative novel American Pastoral, which tells the story of a family ruined by a teenage daughter's dreadful and unexpected act of violence. 'Something is driving them crazy. Something has set them against everything. Something is leading them into disaster.'

What is that something? Look honestly at this society--its political leaders, its religious spokesmen, its corporate CEOs, its military machine, its celebrities, its 'popular' culture, and, above all, the entire economic system upon which the whole vast superstructure of violence, suffering and hypocrisy is based. It is there that the answer is to be found.

Monday, May 16, 2022

Sweden & Finland Joining NATO: A Few Quick Points--Brian Berletic

Ocasio-Cortez, Sanders and the DSA Vote for War--Eric London, World Socialist Website

 

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2022/05/16/dsaw-m16.html

In the history of the socialist movement, parties and political figures are defined above all by their attitude to imperialist war.

On June 16, 1918, Socialist Party leader Eugene V. Debs was arrested and jailed for a speech opposing the US government’s involvement in World War I. Speaking to a large crowd in a park in Canton, Ohio, Debs called the war an imperialist war and denounced the Democratic administration of Woodrow Wilson and the capitalist governments of Europe for waging it.

“Every solitary one of these aristocratic conspirators and would-be murderers claims to be an arch-patriot,” Debs declared. “Every one of them insists that the war is being waged to make the world safe for democracy. What humbug! What rot! What false pretense!”

Debs delivering “Canton Speech”

On May 10, every single Democratic Socialists of America (DSA)-backed member of Congress voted to approve Joe Biden’s request for $40 billion in military and financial aid for Ukraine.

Bernie Sanders, who once published a recording of himself reading Debs’ Canton speech, voted “yes” for war credits and said, “We should always have a debate, but the problem is that Ukraine is in the middle of a very intense war right now. I think every day counts, and I think we have to respond as strongly and vigorously as we can.”

Ocasio-Cortez, who knows nothing about the history of socialism, voted “yes” too. Hoping that people either would not notice or would quickly forget her vote, she refused to issue as much as a press release or tweet explaining her vote. The other DSA members of congress, Rashida Tlaib, Cori Bush and Jamaal Bowman, all voted “yes” as well.

The vote marks a crossing of a political Rubicon. It is an endorsement of the US/NATO war against Russia. It takes money out of the hands of working people confronting inflation and poverty at home and directs it toward death and destruction abroad. It dramatically increases the possibility of a world war between nuclear powers.

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., listens as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., speaks during a news conference at the Capitol in Washington. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

Ocasio-Cortez and Sanders have risen to national prominence by promoting themselves as representatives of the “anti-war” and “left-wing” sentiments of masses of people. The DSA similarly calls itself the “largest socialist organization in America.”  But their pro-imperialist actions speak louder than words. They are nothing more than petty-bourgeois lackeys of the most ruthless imperialist power in the world.

According to a House Appropriations Committee summary of the legislation, Ocasio-Cortez, Sanders and the DSA have cast their votes for the following:

  • $6 billion to pay the salaries of the Ukrainian military, including its fascist Azov Battalion.
  • $9.05 billion to replenish US weapons deployed to Ukrainian military.
  • $3.9 billion for “mission support and intelligence” support and to deploy additional US military equipment to Eastern Europe, including a Patriot missile system.
  • $600 million “for faster missile production” in the US.
  • $500 million “to procure critical munitions to increase the stocks of the Department of Defense.”
  • $4 billion to “build and update” the military capacities of NATO powers in Eastern Europe.
  • $200 million to update the US Embassy in Kiev.
  • $400 million to fund the Ukrainian police.

Ocasio-Cortez’s campaign website states she aims “to put everyday New Yorkers first,” but her vote takes billions of dollars out of the hands of the working class and into building missiles and paying the salaries of Ukrainian fascists who worship the perpetrators of the Holocaust. One cannot fight fascism at home while arming them abroad, nor can one fight “corporate power” in the US while doing Wall Street’s bidding on a global scale.

In 2021, the leadership of the DSA attacked the World Socialist Web Site for exposing Ocasio-Cortez’s denunciation of socialist opposition to Biden as “bad faith” and “privileged” in an article that was read over 100,000 times. The DSA leadership declared that the WSWS was slandering Ocasio-Cortez and manipulating her words, with prominent Democratic political operatives declaring that the WSWS was itself acting in “bad faith.”

Now, Ocasio-Cortez and Sanders have cast a vote to arm American imperialism and its puppet regime in Ukraine as it prosecutes a war that threatens the extinction of humanity. This is an extension of a role Sanders has played since he first entered Congress in 1991.

As it did with DSA member Jamaal Bowman’s vote to fund the Israeli military, the DSA may attempt to distance itself from Ocasio-Cortez and Sanders’ votes in order to shore up its flagging image as a “left” organization. But support for imperialism is a central feature of the DSA’s political character. The DSA was founded by Michael Harrington, who wrote that socialists must play “a pro-American, Cold War, State Department kind of role.” Harrington’s political mentor, Max Shachtman, supported the Korean and Vietnam wars, as well as the Bay of Pigs invasion.

In recent weeks, the DSA has been preparing its justification for supporting imperialist war in the pages of Socialist Forum, one its official publications.

In an article entitled “Breaking Camp: The US Left and Foreign Policy after the War in Ukraine,” Georgetown University Professor Greg Afinogenov argues that “the left” must abandon its opposition to American imperialism in order confront Russia and China.

Economic sanctions, Afinogenov writes, “will not be enough to compel a retreat, let alone to overthrow Putin, and Ukrainian leaders themselves have lost hope in NATO protection.” The article makes no mention of the fact that US sanctions are throwing hundreds of millions of workers to the brink of starvation across the world.

The purpose of Afinogenov’s article is to call for support for US imperialism and its war aims.

“The most controversial feature of contemporary anti-imperialism,” the article states, “Is its tendency to boil down to the simple procedure of determining which side the US is on in any given conflict and automatically taking the opposite position.” Afinogenov writes that “socialists should be wary” of those who base their outlook on a “recognition of the need for rational limits on the use of US power abroad.” He concludes, as a result, that “contemporary anti-imperialism is not a coherent political strategy.”

If the US’s position as world policeman is undermined, Afinogenov writes, it would “give a freer hand to other actors pursuing their own economic or imperial goals, including China and Russia.” Russia, he claims, is “much more aggressive” than US imperialism, and is therefore the main enemy.

Only a pro-war publication operated by a pro-war organization could print such a statement. For the last 30 years, the United States has destroyed entire societies, killing millions in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Somalia, Syria and many other countries. Socialists lend no support to the right-wing Putin regime for its invasion of Ukraine, but to claim that Russia is “more aggressive” than American imperialism is nothing more than war propaganda in the service of the US government aimed at paving the way for its next crimes.

In the same edition of Socialist Forum, another article, entitled “Toward a modern theory of internationalism” by Bjorn Pederson, calls for arming the Ukrainians:

Mutual aid and even sanctions have their place in our response, but they simply are not equal to quickly stopping the Russian war machine. Opposition to military aid is less persuasive when that aid is given at the request of the democratically elected government of a country being invaded, as has happened in Ukraine.

Pederson demands that “the left” cease criticizing American imperialism for its role stoking the conflict: “It doesn’t serve the Left well to spend this moment railing against the limited slate of bad options that have been forced on us by decades of failed international policy.”

The proponents of imperialist war promote the fiction that a victory for American imperialism will serve humanitarian ends. In a May 10 forum hosted by the former publishing house of the now-defunct International Socialist Organization, Haymarket books attempted to put an identity-politics spin on support for arming Ukrainian fascists. During the event, Yulya Yurchenko, a fellow at the George Kennan Institute of the Woodrow Wilson Center (and self-described “feminist activist”) declared:

We must channel theory into praxis. We need to do what is necessary to help the victims of aggression to protect themselves by any means necessary. … that means arming Ukraine and overcoming personal moral conflicts about violence. This is not about us staying pious but about helping those subject to violence, and they need to protect themselves. So, standing by and [calling for] non-interference in such situations are tantamount to condoning the continuation of violence. … The moral choice here is clear. I am also against war. I hate violence in any form. Yet when somebody comes to you with a gun, you waving a flower in their face is not going to solve the problem.

Sanders, Ocasio-Cortez and the DSA are sending weapons to the Ukrainian military not out of theoretical confusion, but because it serves the interests of the privileged social force which they represent.

The pseudo-left represents the top 10 percent of society, a privileged section of the population whose stock portfolios depend upon the ability of American banks and corporations to dominate the world and subjugate its rivals. This layer is now hysterically pro-war and rabid in its denunciations of the Russian people and Russian culture.

The role of the DSA is to provide a “left” propaganda spin on American imperialism’s ruthless war aims. To paraphrase Debs, while there is a political establishment, they are in it. While there is imperialism, they will support it. They represent everything socialism is not.

U.S. Regime Fears Opposing Views Are Gaining Strength (Pepe Escobar report on RT) FROM 2014

Saturday, May 14, 2022

The Imaging of Sagittarius A*: A Monumental Scientific Achievement--Bryan Dyne, WSWS

 https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2022/05/14/per1-m14.html?pk_campaign=newsletter&pk_kwd=wsws

EXCERPT:

Such vast scientific undertakings are becoming increasingly routine. The Large Hadron Collider, the detection of gravitational waves, the IceCube experiment to detect neutrinos, as well as virtually every space mission, require an international effort to succeed. As an example in the negative, the European Space Agency’s ExoMars mission, which was scheduled to launch this year, will now not launch until at least 2028 after Russia withdrew its participation in the mission as a result of sanctions imposed on the country after it was provoked by the US and NATO into war with Ukraine.

The necessity of international collaboration was remarked on by Xavier Barcons, the director general of the European Southern Observatory, who said in a press conference to announce the findings that “This extraordinary result would not have been possible to achieve by one single facility or even the national astronomical community of a single country. It took eight radio observatories around the world, and that network has already expanded to 11 today, many built, funded, operated and supported through international organizations across many countries around the world.”

Barcons then felt compelled to note that the discovery “shows what we can achieve when we cooperate, when we work together. This is very important to remember in the times that we are living in, where the world is not running in that direction unfortunately.”

Indeed not. One can assume that Barcons was referring to the spiraling conflict between NATO and Russia, which threatens humanity with nuclear annihilation. Or perhaps the COVID-19 pandemic, which has killed an estimated 20 million people worldwide and where wealthy countries have hoarded vaccines and other therapeutics.

Barcons could have also been referencing the ongoing and accelerating climate catastrophe, which world governments have done nothing to abate and which threatens to drown the world’s coasts by the end of the century. And despite warnings for more than half a century of the looming disaster, nations have consistently refused to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the name of their national capitalist interests.

This state of affairs is a product of definite social and political relations and objective economic processes. It is the division of the world into rival nation-states competing in a global capitalist market that produces such horrors, not to mention the crushing inequality and poverty faced by billions every day.

Serious scientific collaboration involves a certain conscious effort by those involved to reject the chauvinist and nationalist mantras spewed by every government, governments that would much rather see these scientists producing ever-more terrible weapons of mass destruction than working together toward understanding nature and our place within it.

Those same governments have overseen an astronomical redistribution of wealth during the pandemic, handing over trillions of dollars to Wall Street and other financial markets, while forcing workers back on the job amid a pandemic to pay for the bailouts. The war in Ukraine has produced shortages of basic necessities, food and baby formula, while inflation has skyrocketed, forcing more and more of the world’s population into destitution.

But towering scientific achievements like the imaging of Sagittarius A* give a glimpse of another basis of social organization. If the principles of scientific planning and international collaboration that brought about this triumph were applied to contemporary society, it would be possible to end war, poverty, preventable disease and all other forms of social misery.

The capitalist class has proven that it is resolved only for the continued accumulation of private profit, no matter the consequences to Earth’s ecology or the cost in human lives. It is thus left to the working class, the objectively revolutionary and international social force in society, to overthrow capitalism as a whole, paving the way for a new and higher social order, socialism.

(Emphasis added)

Thursday, May 12, 2022

Thousands of Nurses Protest in DC; Nurses Prepare for Sentencing of RaDonda Vaught on Friday


https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2022/05/12/heal-m12.html

Healthcare workers march in Washington, DC on May 12, 2022. [Photo: WSWS]



Murderous Israeli Army -- From Carlos Latuff

 

Shireen Abu Akleh, the 55th Palestinian journalist killed by the Israeli occupation forces.

Tuesday, May 10, 2022

On Anniversary of Defeat of Nazi Regime, German Chancellor Scholz Delivers War Speech

 

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2022/05/10/pers-m10.html?pk_campaign=newsletter&pk_kwd=wsws

Seventy-seven years after the unconditional surrender of the Wehrmacht during World War II, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz (Social Democrats) used the anniversary to justify an unprecedented rearmament of the German army (Bundeswehr) and a massive expansion of the proxy war against Russia. To this end, he trivialized and relativized the crimes of the Nazi regime in an unspeakable manner and drew on the worst traditions of German great power politics.

German chancellors rarely address the population in a televised address on current issues. Merkel did so only once during her 16-year tenure, at the height of the coronavirus pandemic. Scholz now used this means on the day of the liberation from fascism to propagandise for an aggressive drive to war with Russia and announce further arms deliveries to Ukraine.

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz (SPD) during his war speech on May 8, 2022 [AP Photo/Britta Pedersen/Pool]

Scholz accused Russian President Vladimir Putin of wanting to “subjugate Ukraine to destroy its culture and identity” with his “barbaric attack.” In this way, according to Scholz, Putin brought “war, genocide and tyranny” back to Europe. “We defend law and freedom—alongside the attacked. We support Ukraine in the fight against the aggressor. Not doing so would mean surrendering to sheer violence—and encouraging the aggressor.”

Germany will therefore not accept “a Russian-dictated peace,” Scholz proclaimed, thereby indirectly admitting that he sees himself as a war party in the conflict. In keeping with this, he announced that he would supply Ukraine with further heavy weaponry to defeat Russia militarily.

The historic decision to let German tanks roll against Russia once again is not driven by “security and peace” and least of all the protection of the Ukrainian population. Instead, Germany and the other NATO powers have systematically provoked Russia’s reactionary invasion to allow them to wage a proxy war against Russia on the backs of the Ukrainian population.

As early as 2014, the German government supported the coup against Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych to bring the country into its own sphere of influence and against Russia. The coup was based on right-wing extremist paramilitaries, such as the Right Sector, which were to gain ever greater influence over politics in the following years.

In the months leading up to the Russian invasion, the Ukrainian government, with massive support from the US and Germany, has been preparing to bring the areas held by pro-Russian separatists in the east of the country under its military control. A war against Russia in Crimea was also planned.

The Putin regime reacted to this aggression with poisonous nationalism and its reactionary attack on Ukraine. This was seized upon by Germany as a pretext to implement the largest rearmament programme since the Second World War. All restrictions imposed on Germany after the world war are to be removed, and the Bundeswehr will be rebuilt into the largest European army.

When Scholz declares that Germany will not accept a “dictated peace” and is fighting for Russia’s military defeat, the logic is a direct confrontation with Russia, leading to a nuclear world war. He mentioned the concern about this danger only briefly before declaring in a dismissive manner, “Fear must not paralyze us.”

The German government has already delivered tanks from former East German stockpiles to Ukraine and announced further heavy arms deliveries. These include anti-aircraft tanks and self-propelled howitzers that are capable of enormous destruction. Germany and NATO are ready to lay waste to Ukraine in order to defeat Russia.

As before in the First and Second World Wars, this goes hand in hand with deafening war propaganda and with anti-Russian chauvinism and racism. “All Russians are our enemies now,” the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, for example, headlined an interview with Ukrainian Ambassador Andrij Melnyk, who is an avowed follower of the Nazi collaborator Stepan Bandera.

With its heavy weaponry, Germany is equipping the Azov Battalion and other neo-Nazi units. These groups are the political descendants of Bandera’s Organisation of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN), which was responsible for the murder of thousands of Ukrainian Jews.

Scholz’s talk of “freedom and security in Europe” is just as credible as Hitler’s speech to the German people on June 22, 1941, the day of the German invasion of the Soviet Union. Hitler, too, based the justification for his war on attacks by the Soviet Union on Finland and Romania and declared: “But if the circumstances have forced me to remain silent again and again, the time has now come when continuing to stand by would not only be a sin of omission, but a crime against the German people, yes, against the whole of Europe.”

In Scholz’s official televised address on the day of unconditional surrender, the terms “Holocaust,” in which 6 million Jews were industrially exterminated, and “war of annihilation,” which was planned in detail by Nazi Germany, did not appear. At the beginning of his speech, he only mustered some general phrases about 60 million war victims and millions who were murdered on the front and in the concentration camps.

The rest of the speech was devoted to the Russian war against Ukraine. Only two days earlier, in a speech in Hamburg, Scholz used the terms “war of annihilation” and “break with civilization,” which were previously reserved for the description of the unprecedented crimes of the Wehrmacht. Scholz claimed that Russia was waging a “war of extermination” and was “breaking with civilization.”

This is an utter falsification of history that trivializes and relativizes the crimes of German imperialism. The Russian invasion of Ukraine is politically reactionary and appeals to Russian nationalism, but it cannot be compared to the Wehrmacht’s war of annihilation, let alone the Holocaust.

The forces deployed by the Putin regime against Ukraine are minuscule compared to the invasion force hurled by Hitler against Russia in 1941. Historian Stephen G. Fritz described the invasion as follows:

Deploying over 3 million men, 3,600 tanks, 600,000 motorized vehicles (as well as 625,000 horses), 7,000 artillery pieces, and 2,500 aircraft (a number that was actually smaller than that employed during the invasion of France), the Germans had launched the largest military operation in history. [Ostkrieg: Hitler's War of Extermination in the East]

Germany’s “Operation Barbarossa,” Fritz continued:

was not only the most massive military campaign in history, but it also unleashed an unprecedented campaign of genocidal violence, of which the Holocaust remains the best-known example. This Judeocide, however, was not an isolated act of murder; rather, it formed part of a deliberate, comprehensive plan of exploitation, a utopian scheme of racial reorganization and demographic engineering of vast proportions.

For a German chancellor, who is entirely familiar with this history, to compare the invasion of Ukraine to the Nazi war of extermination is politically obscene.

Moreover, the Russian campaign does not even come close to the brutality of the US-led and German-backed wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya, where entire countries have been razed to the ground and millions of people killed. Even the New York Times had to admit this, quoting US officials in an article on May 3 that the Russian forces showed “remarkable restraint” in the war.

The German chancellor’s speech is part of a widespread falsification of history. The Social Democrat/Left Party/Green Senate government in the state of Berlin banned the display of Soviet flags at the memorial sites of the Red Army, while allowing the neo-Nazi group “The Third Way” to demonstrate at the Holocaust Memorial for Ukraine.

When the German government supported the coup of 2014 and proclaimed the “end of Germany’s military restraint,” this was accompanied by the trivialization of Nazi crimes. In February 2014 an article appeared in Der Spiegel, which quoted the now deceased Nazi apologist Ernst Nolte with the assertion “that the share the Poles and English had [in the outbreak of the Second World War] must be weighted more heavily than it usually is.”

In the same article, Jörg Baberowski, a professor at Humboldt University, declared: “Nolte was done an injustice. Historically speaking, he was right.” As a reason, he stated: “Hitler was not a psychopath, and he wasn’t vicious. He did not want to talk about the extermination of the Jews at his table.” In addition, he compared the Holocaust to shootings in the Russian civil war, commenting, “Essentially, it was the same thing: industrial killing.”

Baberowski was celebrated by representatives of all parties. Today, his revanchist positions are official government policy. Scholz’s attempt to use the slogan “Never again war!” to justify his war policy and falsification of history is particularly despicable. Contributing to “freedom and security” to the best of our ability, claimed Scholz, is the contemporary meaning of “Never again!”

The slogan “Never again!” already gained popularity after the First World War and was unforgettably portrayed by the communist artist Käthe Kollwitz. After the worst crimes in human history, which German imperialism unleashed in the Second World War, the sentence became deeply anchored in the consciousness of the masses in Germany and all over the world.

Scholz and the federal government will not erase this deep conviction with the hijacking of the slogan for their warmongering. On the contrary, the character of Germany’s war policy is becoming increasingly apparent. It encounters its main opposition in the working population.

It is now imperative to turn this opposition into conscious resistance and to arm it with an internationalist and socialist perspective. Only the active intervention of the Russian and Ukrainian workers together with the workers of all countries can stop the madness.