These movements aren't separate from another, and that's very important.
Another great article from Information Clearinghouse.
These movements aren't separate from another, and that's very important.
Another great article from Information Clearinghouse.
It's embarrassing that America -- and the world -- will be witnessing a PRO-WAR rally in Washington, D.C. on April 30 (a project of SaveDarfur.org) that is far more highly publicized than an anti-war one (that appears to be poorly organized) in New York City on April 29, even while Washington is still soldiering on in Afghanistan and Iraq and gunning for sanctions or war on Iran.
From Yoshie Furuhashie in Monthly Review zine.From an article in The Age. Not sure whether President Ahmadinejad is signaling "peace" or "victory" here.
FROM ANTIWAR.COM
"Let no one say they were against this war with Iran, when it comes, if they didn't vote with the heroic 21 naysayers. These sanctions against Iran are but a prelude to war, just as sanctions were the first step in the long run-up to the invasion of Iraq. However, we may not enjoy such a lengthy interval between cause and effect this time around. Events are proceeding at an ever accelerating pace, with Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice now saying the time for talking is over and the time for action has begun – not military action (at least not yet), but action by the Security Council of the United Nations, whose "credibility is at stake." I wonder if that same standard applies to the many UN resolutions that Israel continues to defy. Hasn't the UN already lost all credibility when such brazen defiance has gone unnoticed by the Security Council?"
"Let no one say they weren't warned. Using Iraq as a "model" for the methodology of the War Party, we can see, when it comes to Iran, that all the elements are falling neatly into place. Once again, we have the specter of WMD and their possible existence or nonexistence: a mirage projected by the credulous Western "mainstream" media, one that is sure to dissipate only after we're waist-deep in an Iranian quagmire. Another familiar phenomenon: dubious exile groups, along the lines of the infamous Iraqi National Congress, only this time even wackier, wilder, and woolier."
For example, here's some info on BP Oil Company:
"In March, 15 workers were incinerated, and more than 170 injured, following an explosion at BP’s sprawling refinery in Texas City, Texas.
It was the third fatal accident at the Texas City BP facility in the last four years.
In September 2004, two workers were burned to death and another was seriously injured.
In 2001, a maintenance worker at the facility died after falling into a tank that had been shut down. Nationwide, BP’s facilities have had more than 3,565 accidents since 1990, ranking first in the nation, according to a 2004 report by the Texas Public Interest Research Group (TexPIRG).
BP has admitted it was at fault in the Texas City explosion. “We regret that our mistakes have caused so much suffering,” said Ross Pillari, president of BP Products North America, after the company had completed an interim investigation in May."
Of course, there will be no criminal investigation. These were all just "accidents."
Found on Common Dreams.org
The same question applies today as Americans wrestle with the mounting death toll in Iraq, Kerry said, speaking before about 500 supporters who punctuated his speech at least 20 times with ovations.
"Lives have been lost to bad decisions," Kerry said. "Not decisions that could have gone either way, but decisions that constitute basic negligence and incompetence. And lives continue to be lost because of stubbornness and pride."
Will anyone ask him to explain how and when he came to this conclusion? How many people have died needlessly because he voted for the Iraq war resolution and then ran for president on a platform of sending MORE troops to Iraq.
When he is elected and brings the troops back from Iraq, will he be sending them to Iran, as he hinted in a statement he made a couple of weeks ago?
When she [Hillary] came into office, she was already
committed to preventing Iran obtaining a nuclear weapon,
by military means if necessary. Meanwhile,the Iranian
regime had abandoned all restraint in its pursuit of that
objective, calculating that its own best chances of survival
lay in the swiftest possible acquisition of a nuclear
deterrent. In February 2009,an alarming intelligence report
reached Washington, suggesting that Tehran -- using a secret
cascade of its version of the P-2 centrifuge --
was much closer to obtaining a bomb than had been thought.
In a series of crisis meetings, President Clinton, her new
secretary of state, Richard Holbrooke, and her new
secretary of defense, Joe Biden, decided that they could
afford to wait no longer. Operation Gulf Peace, for
which the Pentagon had long made detailed contingency plans,
started on March 6, 2009.
This came from a Marxmail post by Fred Feldman. The author of the article
is pretty Islamophobic, but paints a scary picture of what may be coming.
From Tony Judt in NYTimes:
"The damage that is done by America's fear of anti-Semitism when discussing Israel is threefold. It is bad for Jews: anti-Semitism is real enough (I know something about it, growing up Jewish in 1950's Britain), but for just that reason it should not be confused with political criticisms of Israel or its American supporters. It is bad for Israel: by guaranteeing it unconditional support, Americans encourage Israel to act heedless of consequences. The Israeli journalist Tom Segev described the Mearsheimer-Walt essay as "arrogant" but also acknowledged ruefully: "They are right. Had the United States saved Israel from itself, life today would be better ...the Israel Lobby in the United States harms Israel's true interests."
BUT above all, self-censorship is bad for the United States itself. Americans are denying themselves participation in a fast-moving international conversation. Daniel Levy (a former Israeli peace negotiator) wrote in Haaretz that the Mearsheimer-Walt essay should be a wake-up call, a reminder of the damage the Israel lobby is doing to both nations. But I would go further. I think this essay, by two "realist" political scientists with no interest whatsoever in the Palestinians, is a straw in the wind."
Once again, thanks to Angry Arab.Human rights, China analysts point out, play no role in Beijing's investments. Michael Green, who handled Asian affairs on Mr Bush's National Security Council until December, recalled a discussion with a Chinese official on doing business in Sudan.
"He said, 'Look, we don't care about internal issues like genocide, we only care about the oil because we need the resources'."
Found article on Angry Arab Newservice, unfailingly good source for news.The Tel Aviv bombing on Monday received intensive,Virtually all of these Israeli government, military and settler crimes
extensive, and poignant BBC coverage, including
pictures of pieces of human flesh shredded by
the force of the explosion. Below is a partial
list from occupied Palestne of shellings,killings,
robberies, savage beatings,attacks on schools
and infrastructure,home demolitions,kidnappings,
the use of sewage as a weapon, and more.
The list that is linked to above is amazing in the absolute horror it evokes.
Think about living with this kind of mayhem, day in, day out.
From a post on Marxmail.org
Four points can serve as an initial platform or program for this [the Latino] left wing.
A) Legalization for all; a “road to citizenship” on the same
conditions as all other immigrants.
B) Yes to massively expanded normal immigration from Latin America on
the same conditions as all other immigrants; no to a new Bracero program;
C) The Latino community and especially the immigrants must own and run
this movement; YES to support from Black and white and non-profit and
trade union and political party (even Republican) allies, NO to
non-Latino control over our destiny and our movement.
D) For continuing with the campaign of massive public protests.
FOUND ON FERAL SCHOLAR--Stan Goff's blogJust as generals do, diplomats and journalists tend to refight the last war. Schooled in Bosnia and Kosovo, Washington's officials came to Iraq with the notion that because some Iraqis were Shia and others Sunni, these identities were bound to clash. This simplification was accepted by much of the media, influenced by their own Balkan experiences. It gathered weight when people watched the sectarian behaviour of Iraq's religious leaders, particularly among the Shia. They had led the resistance to Saddam and saw no reason to retreat from politics once he was gone.
In fact Iraq has no history of Balkan-style pogroms where neighbour turns against neighbour, burning homes and shops. But it could develop now. The rampaging by Shia militias and the rise of defensive Sunni vigilantes have launched a low-intensity ethnic cleansing. Up to 30,000 people have left their homes in the last few weeks.
SPOTTED ON CURSOR.ORGBelow is a comment from Fred Feldman on the Marxmail list about why the firings happened.
The linked article also includes the original article about the firings. Linda
The more undocumented immigrants, other immigrants, and supporters are
able to be bold and assertive, and insistent on their rights, the worse
it is for their employers. While these employers have sound material
reasons to oppose expelling the undocumented en masse, they prefer to
hire them as humble pariahs. How can they impose minimum -- or even
lower than minimum -- wages, sexual and other harassment, unsafe working
conditions on people who are emerging as powerful and united fighters?
So these firings are about a lot more than missing a day of work, which
immigrant workers, like others, do from time to time. This is an
attempt to crack down on a movement that threatens to shake up the
social relations the employers represent and need.
For instance, what becomes of THEIR power to use the INS against restive
workers if deportation becomes more difficult because of mass
struggles. These nationalist, Latino pride, working class protests are
part of the working-class struggle against the conditions these workers
face here as well as for their right to be here.
Fred Feldman
ISREAL STEPS UP MILITARY ACTION IN GAZA STRIP
Angry Arab Newservice points out that the headline makes this sound like Israel is in combat with the Palestinians, when actually Israel is bombing them from the air. The first para says 8 GUNMEN are killed. The second said TWO MEMBERS of Al-Aqsa brigade were killed. Did Washington Post go see whether the other six Palestinians who died were carrying "guns."
And what about the five-year old boy who was among several Palestinians killed in a bombing raid the night before. Was he carrying a squirt gun?"Disabled in a work-related accident 20 years ago, the 56-year-old preacher turned his attention to social issues in New Orleans. He says the despair in parts of his city was just as deep during the two terms of Democrat Bill Clinton, and that elected officials in New Orleans have to accept some of the blame for money wasted and opportunities squandered.
FOUND ON CURSOR.ORG