Tweet
"Before and after the invasion of 2003, anti-war Democrats have argued with me about the merits of the Democratic Party. I have heard, and continue to hear, every lame excuse in the book about the party acquiescing to the warmongers from "They had bad information" to "That’s not their real position." Facts are facts. The Democrats allowed George Bush to invade Iraq for one reason: they were afraid that if the U.S. attacked Iraq and that the soldiers were welcomed with flowers and candy, they would have been on the wrong side of the issue and would have been considered anti-American. No matter how they talk today, Madeleine Albright, John Kerry, and many other Democrats allowed the invasion to occur. Integrity, research and truth went out the window.
Despite all their current anti-war talk, there is one aspect missing from the hollow mouths of the Democrats: not one has mentioned the plight of the Iraqi people and the hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilian deaths and the destruction of the country that came about because of their silence."
Having just watched the snake Kerry give the speech referred to above, the utter cynicism is mindblowing. He talks about Iraqis resisting our invasion as being participants in the global war on terror, which he wants to continue fighting--although he would of course do it better than Bush.
If the antiwar movement latches on to Kerry again as their representative--I was going to say they would be in for a rude awakening--but I don't think they've awakened from their last dream yet. So odds are here we go again. Kerry for President--The Guy Who Can Do Bush's War Better.
FROM URUKNET.INFO
SIRATYST (Stuff I Read and Thought You Should Too) -- “To ravage, to slaughter, to usurp under false titles, they call empire; and where they make a desert, they call it peace.” (Calgacus, as quoted by Tacitus, Agricola 30-31)"
No comments:
Post a Comment